Paramount merger: what does this mean for its shares?
The Paramount merger with Skydance Media will create a group worth $28 billion. But what will this mean for its stock?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0192/f0192c171245f3bfae7dacd0b79cffe212cc1e3e" alt="Paramount Studios in Los Angeles"
One of Hollywood’s oldest companies, the entertainment giant Paramount Global, has agreed to merge with independent film studio Skydance Media, creating a group worth $28 billion, says Peter Hoskins on the BBC.
As part of the “complex” deal, Skydance will pay $2.4 billion for National Amusements, owned by non-executive chair Shari Redstone. It holds just 10% of Paramount Group’s shares, but accounts for almost 80% of voting rights. It is the “end of an era” for the Redstone family, which “transformed a chain of drive-in cinemas into a vast media empire”.
No wonder Redstone is throwing in the towel, says AJ Bell’s Russ Mould. The stock has fallen by 78% in five years, while rival Netflix has gained 85%. The problem was Paramount’s “big gamble” on the streaming sector, with its Paramount+ platform “failing to gain the kind of traction enjoyed by Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Disney+”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b64/a0b64dc4570f2901441dfc9e97a62ae665f79e04" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg"
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
With streaming platform owners now focusing on making a profit on their services, rather than just building up market share, Skydance “will have to think long and hard about Paramount Plus’s future” if it wants to bring a sense of “sparkle” to the company.
Given that Paramount+ is “haemorrhaging money while reaching approximately a quarter of Netflix’s 270 million subscribers”, says Jennifer Saba on Breakingviews, completely ditching the “subscale, expensive direct-to-consumer strategy should be on the table”.
The focus should be on partnerships, with Paramount and “much-better-equipped Goliath” Comcast already in talks about streaming jointly. Selling content to other streaming services should also be explored.
The deal highlights that the post-Netflix era has been a “costly bust for the stragglers of media, like fellow family-controlled pipsqueak AMC Networks or even Warner Bros. Discovery”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.
He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.
Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.
As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.
Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri
-
Spot the Dog: £67bn in underperforming funds revealed
Around 137 funds consistently underperformed their benchmark, BestInvest's Spot the Dog report finds. Which funds are in the dog house?
By Katie Williams Published
-
What does a BP and Shell merger mean for the UK oil industry?
BP’s struggles have made it vulnerable to a takeover. Could it merge with Shell to create a British behemoth?
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
What does a potential BP and Shell merger mean for the UK oil industry?
BP’s struggles have made it vulnerable to a takeover. Could it merge with Shell to create a British behemoth?
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Should you invest in emerging markets?
Emerging markets offer strong, long-term growth and excellent value, says Rupert Hargreaves
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
How to invest in frontier markets
Frontier markets can be extremely risky, but they offer access to exotic stocks in rapidly developing countries
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
Should you put your trust in investment trusts?
British investors have steered clear of investment trusts in recent years. They are missing a trick, says Max King
By Max King Published
-
Renewable energy investing: who is paying for the green revolution?
Investors in renewables have not been rewarded, says Bruce Packard. Will they fund the government’s plans?
By Bruce Packard Published
-
The best ways to invest in Vietnam – Asia’s communist dynamo
Vietnam has long been one of our favourite markets. The prognosis remains auspicious, says Alex Rankine.
By Alex Rankine Published
-
India is a new global powerhouse — should you invest?
India’s growth rate has slowed recently, but there is still ample scope for investors to benefit from its development.
By David Prosser Published
-
Why Chinese stocks are so far out of favour
There’s little appetite for Chinese stocks despite low valuations.
By Cris Sholto Heaton Published