Why Amazon is splitting its shares
Slicing a cake into more pieces doesn’t give you more cake. So why is Amazon dividing its shares by 20?
Amazon has just announced a stock split for the first time since the dotcom bubble years. It’s the fourth such split in the company’s near-30-year history. Assuming the move is approved at the annual general meeting in May, then from 6 June, Amazon’s investors will get 19 extra shares for each one they already hold (what’s known as a 20-for-one split). Alphabet – Google’s parent company – did the same thing last month, for only the second time since it went public in 2004.
To be very clear, share splits make no difference to the value of the company. It’s as if I gave you a cake, then said I was going to cut it into 20 slices. You’d still have exactly the same amount of cake (for the pedants out there, we’ll assume no loss to crumbling or sticking to the knife). Yet the share price bounced significantly on the news. So to ask the obvious question: what’s the point of doing this, and why the excitement?
What’s the point?
The rationale often given for stock splits is to reduce the price of an individual share, thus making them more accessible – and indeed, that’s how Amazon spun it. Yet as we note below, this isn’t all that convincing, particularly in these days, when fractional share ownership is possible.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Bloomberg’s Jonathan Levin and Eric Savitz in Barron’s suggest a more convincing reason why Amazon and Alphabet might want to consider stock splits. It’s all about getting more exposure to index-tracking funds. How? Alongside the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is the best-known stock index in the US. It comprises 30 big-name US companies. However, it’s built in a way that may have made sense when it was launched in 1896, but no longer does. The S&P 500 – like most headline market indices – is based on market capitalisation (the share price multiplied by the number of shares in issue). In short, the bigger the market cap, the greater its weighting in the index.
By contrast, the Dow is weighted simply by share price. For example, UnitedHealth Group is the top-weighted Dow stock with a share price of around $500. Intel is the lowest, on $45. Yet United’s market cap of $460bn is less than three times that of Intel on $181bn. As a result of this odd methodology, the committee makes sure that the highest-priced stock in the index remains roughly ten times the price of the lowest. That means Amazon or Alphabet on share prices of around $2,500-$3,000 are simply too pricey for the Dow (whereas Apple, a fellow tech giant, is in the Dow with a share price of around $150). A 20-for-one split will put both in the running for the Dow – and all that lovely passive money flow.
John is the executive editor of MoneyWeek and writes our daily investment email, Money Morning. John graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news. John joined MoneyWeek in 2005.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
British Airways revamps Avios scheme bringing down flight prices to £1
With the new Avios part-payments scheme you can now bag a British Airways flight for as little as £1
By Oojal Dhanjal Published
-
RBS to close a fifth of branches
Royal Bank of Scotland plans to shut 18 branches across Scotland, resulting in the loss of 105 jobs. We have the full list of closures.
By Ruth Emery Published
-
The industry at the heart of global technology
The semiconductor industry powers key trends such as artificial intelligence, says Rupert Hargreaves
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Three emerging Asian markets to invest in
Professional investor Chetan Sehgal of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust tells us where he’d put his money
By Chetan Sehgal Published
-
What to consider before investing in small-cap indexes
Small-cap index trackers show why your choice of benchmark can make a large difference to long-term returns
By Cris Sholto Heaton Published
-
Why space investments are the way to go for investors
Space investments will change our world beyond recognition, UK investors should take note
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Time to tap into Africa’s mobile money boom
Favourable demographics have put Africa on the path to growth when it comes to mobile money and digital banking
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
M&S is back in fashion: but how long can this success last?
M&S has exceeded expectations in the past few years, but can it keep up the momentum?
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
The end of China’s boom
Like the US, China too got fat on fake money. Now, China's doom is not far away.
By Bill Bonner Published
-
Magic mushrooms — an investment boom or doom?
Investing in these promising medical developments might see you embark on the trip of a lifetime.
By Bruce Packard Published