Oil shock averted? World leaders and commodity traders have spent the past fortnight on edge as the long-running Iran-Israel conflict turned hot. Matters came to a head at the weekend when the US directly entered the war, bombing three Iranian nuclear facilities with fearsome bunker-buster bombs.
That dramatic escalation gave the lie to the popular notion that Donald Trump is a “chicken” (“Trump Always Chickens Out”, or TACO, as traders say), says Simon Nixon on Substack. In the grand scheme of things, few geopolitical events have a material impact on markets. But those that do – the 1970s oil crisis, or Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine – have had devastating economic effects.
A “very weak” riposte
American B-2 Spirit bombers had breached Tehran’s reddest of red lines. The world waited with bated breath for its response. Iran’s parliament, which only has an advisory role, voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage responsible for shipping some 30% of the world’s seaborne oil. Analysts warned that such a scenario could send oil prices spiralling above $100 a barrel.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
In the event, Monday proved a turning point. Tehran didn’t close the strait. Instead, it fired missiles on a nearly empty American base in Qatar, telegraphed in advance – a face-saving de-escalation that Trump dubbed “very weak”. By Tuesday evening, a fragile ceasefire appeared to have taken hold.
Brent crude began to sell off “within seven minutes” of the first Iranian strikes in Qatar, say Malcolm Moore, George Steer and Jamie Smyth in the Financial Times. Within two hours, the price had dropped more than 7%. But for all the drama of flying missiles, traders had “correctly concluded that the attacks would reduce, rather than heighten, tensions”. Satellite images showed the US had removed aeroplanes from the air base days earlier. “It is all orchestrated, we know the base is empty,” said Jorge Montepeque of Onyx Capital.
Brent crude oil prices tumbled nearly 13% over Monday and Tuesday to trade below $68 a barrel as the Iran risk premium diminished. Global stock markets rallied, with America’s S&P 500 jumping to within 1% of the record high it reached in February.
The risk that Iran would actually go through with closing Hormuz may always have been overstated, according to Tom Holland and Tom Miller of Gavekal Research. America would not be the major victim of a closure of Hormuz. These days, most of the oil that flows through the strait heads east to Asia. China sources “around half of its oil imports from the region”. Closing Hormuz would harm Iran’s friends more than its opponents.
Oil glut incoming
Just a few years ago, an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear programme was regarded as the ultimate oil-market tail risk, says Javier Blas on Bloomberg. Analysts talked of oil topping its $147-a-barrel all-time high, or even going above $200 a barrel for the first time. Yet the rise of US shale has transformed energy markets. Indeed, for all the “hysteria” about Hormuz, the world now looks to be heading for an oil supply surge. Opec producers have raised production quotas, and the evidence suggests that Iran’s own production will hit “a fresh seven-year high” this month, an amazing achievement given the country has endured two weeks of bombing.
It’s worth remembering that oil kept flowing largely uninterrupted during the first and second Gulf Wars, and the end of both conflicts brought a fresh jump in supply. If history is any guide, oil prices could be poised to fall “quite a lot”.
The US shale revolution has transformed global power politics, agrees Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in The Telegraph. American frackers have been adding the equivalent of “a new North Sea every three years”. Today the country is “by far the largest combined producer of oil, petroleum products and natural gas” in the world.
Previous US administrations avoided striking Iran for fear of triggering an oil crisis. Thanks to shale, today the country’s leaders have the energy independence to push Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei much harder than in the past. “It is undoubtedly a stunning political victory for Trump.”
A pause, not peace
Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also won a “dazzling, daunting, dangerous victory”, says The Economist. An irate Trump very publicly forced him to halt strikes on Iran on Tuesday, but this nevertheless remains a “moment of triumph”. Israel, a nation of ten million people, has gained “air superiority over much of the Middle East” and subdued its most dangerous enemies in a multi-front war that began on 7 October 2023.
Investors have noticed the geopolitical shift, says David Wainer in The Wall Street Journal. The Israeli TA-125 share index has outperformed the global average, climbing 11.5% over the past month. It registered five straight daily gains last week even as ballistic missiles rained down on Tel Aviv and Haifa.
Why the euphoria? The bet appears to be that the “risk premium” attached to investing in Israel is falling as threats diminish from Hezbollah and Iran. That could encourage more inward investment from abroad. Yet risks remain, from an Iranian regime that might choose to accelerate its nuclear programme to “international opprobrium” over the unresolved Palestinian conflict.
Future developments remain unpredictable, says Marc Champion on Bloomberg. Will the humiliated Iranian regime survive? Will it accelerate its nuclear programme to deter future attacks? The current ceasefire should hold – Iran has few ways to strike back, and Israel has achieved its main military objectives. But “there will be no forever-peace between the Islamic Republic and Israel”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
How to pay in a chequeReceiving or writing a cheque has become much less common in recent years as instant bank transfers have grown in popularity. Amid widespread bank branch closures, we explain what to do if you get a cheque, and how you can pay one into your bank account.
-
Crypto assets of seven million UK investors at risk – how to keep yours safeCryptocurrency wallet rules make it hard to track down assets after someone has died, even if they leave a will saying who they would like to inherit them
-
Why investors can no longer trust traditional statistical indicatorsOpinion The statistical indicators and data investors have relied on for decades are no longer fit for purpose. It's time to move on, says Helen Thomas
-
What we can learn from Britain’s "Dashing Dozen" stocksStocks that consistently outperform the market are clearly doing something right. What can we learn from the UK's top performers and which ones are still buys?
-
The most likely outcome of the AI boom is a big fallOpinion Like the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, AI is not paying off – despite huge investments being made in the hope of creating AI-based wealth
-
The rise of Robin Zeng: China’s billionaire battery kingRobin Zeng, a pioneer in EV batteries, is vying with Li Ka-shing for the title of Hong Kong’s richest person. He is typical of a new kind of tycoon in China
-
The goal of business is not profit, but virtueOpinion Serve your customers well, and the profits will follow, according to a new book. It rarely works the other way around, says Stuart Watkins
-
Earnings estimates are a rigged game – especially in the USThe number of US stocks beating earnings estimates tells us only that guidance has deliberately been set too low
-
How Trump's dog deals will damage global trade with the USOpinion Some commentators are hailing Trump’s trading savvy. Are they right?
-
How to approach active ETFsActive ETFs have several advantages over other forms of open-ended investment vehicles, says David Prosser
