Stockmarkets shrug off Covid – but want more stimulus

Stockmarkets don’t care about the American president’s health – just don’t take away their stimulus drip.

US stock indices shrugged off news of Donald Trump’s hospitalisation over the weekend. The S&P 500 hit a one-month high as Trump was discharged on Monday. Yet the early optimism was undone when Trump ordered an end to talks with Democrats on a second stimulus bill. The S&P 500 finished Tuesday down by 1.4%. 

The first stimulus bill lapsed over the summer, leaving unemployed Americans to depend on a patchwork of measures rolled out by the White House and individual states. The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives had initially called for $3.4trn in new support measures before reducing its demand to $2.2trn last week, while the Republican-controlled Senate favoured a figure closer to $1.6trn. 

Would equities prefer Biden? 

Trump’s surprise announcement that he would ask Republican allies to stop negotiating a stimulus will please fiscal conservatives wary of ever more federal spending, says the BBC’s Anthony Zurcher. Yet it is difficult to see how this benefits Trump politically. A new wave of economic angst before the election will do the incumbent no favours. 

The odds of a Joe Biden victory leapt over the weekend in betting markets, says Irwin Stelzer in The Sunday Times. That could be good for stocks, which “abhor uncertainty” when Trump is “uncertainty incarnate”. JPMorgan and Citigroup argue that a Biden presidency will be bullish for shares. They say it could deliver an economic “sugar high” from stimuli, especially if Democrats also take the Senate, as is looking increasingly likely. 

In reality, investors are broadly agnostic about who prevails in November, Scott Knapp of CUNA Mutual Group tells the Associated Press. “It’s pretty difficult to overstate how understated the market’s reaction was,” to the president’s Covid-19 diagnosis. Investors don’t care for Donald Trump’s trade wars, but they seem just as unexcited about Joe Biden’s tax and regulate agenda. What does scare them is the prospect of a disputed election. 

The president is unwell

Most presidential health scares make little impact on markets, but there have been exceptions, says Lex in the Financial Times. Eisenhower’s heart attack in 1955 saw the S&P 500 fall by nearly 7%, while it dropped by 3% following JFK’s assassination in 1963. Yet three months later – and this applies to nine out of ten pre-Trump health incidents – the market was either up or down by less than 1%. (The exception was Truman’s 1952 hospitalisation.) That is a testament to the strength of America’s institutions, which do not depend upon the health of one man. 

Trump’s illness may have a larger impact than usual as it could shape US pandemic policy, says Jeremy Warner in The Daily Telegraph. Yet all this fretting about the election and American democracy seems overdone. Investors may complain about Washington, but they still buy the dollar and that says a lot more than words alone.

Most Popular

The Bank of England should create a "Bitpound" digital currency and take the world by storm
Bitcoin

The Bank of England should create a "Bitpound" digital currency and take the world by storm

The Bank of England could win the race to create a respectable digital currency if it moves quickly, says Matthew Lynn.
18 Oct 2020
Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts
Bank accounts

Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts

Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK bankin…
19 Oct 2020
What would negative interest rates mean for your money?
UK Economy

What would negative interest rates mean for your money?

There has been much talk of the Bank of England introducing negative interest rates. John Stepek explains why they might do that, and what it would me…
15 Oct 2020