There will be targets, quotas and guidelines. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is planning to hustle the UK’s largest pension funds into investing more money in unquoted UK assets, with a new voluntary code expected to be unveiled over the next few weeks that could unlock tens of billions of pounds in extra cash for British industry.
The final version of the code – called the Mansion House Compact – will be revealed over the summer. It’s likely to stop short of setting any compulsory quotas for pension funds to invest a set percentage of their assets in the UK, an idea Reeves toyed with while she was in opposition.
However, it is expected to include a voluntary commitment to invest 10% in unlisted assets such as infrastructure projects and start-ups, amounting to around £100 billion of fresh money. Roughly half of that is supposed to be invested specifically in the UK.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Step-change for UK pension funds investing
If this happens, it will be a step-change in the way that UK pension funds invest their money, steering it away from global bonds and traditional mega-cap equities into far less conventional assets. And it’s easy to argue it will be better for both sides.
The pension funds will make far better returns than they would from the more traditional investments that have dominated their typical portfolios for the past 50 years. The bond market, after all, is still generating historically low returns and, with Wall Street looking far less attractive under Donald Trump’s volatile tariff regime, mainstream equities are not looking much better, either. At the same time, putting more money to work in private assets should boost economic growth. It will help fund badly needed improvements to the UK’s infrastructure and put cash into the start-ups and venture-capital funds that are far more likely to kick-start growth.
The problem is that the government is, at the same time, also making the UK a far worse place to invest or start a business. In her first Budget, Reeves raided the corporate sector for an extra £24 billion by putting up national insurance paid by employers, a levy that has made it far more expensive to employ people. At the same time, the living wage has been pushed up well ahead of the rate of inflation, and the government is pushing ahead with a major overhaul of employment law to give workers more rights. The UK used to have one of the most flexible labour markets in the developed world, making it relatively risk-free for companies to expand their payroll as they grew. That is now in the past.
We also have some of the most expensive industrial energy prices in the world and the government has imposed an endless series of extra charges on companies to combat climate change, such as a packaging levy, for example, or the extra tax that will have to be paid on business class flights.
Wealthy foreigners have been driven out of the country by changes to the non-dom rule that exempted them from tax on earnings outside the UK, even though many of them were building businesses in this country. Windfall taxes have been imposed on energy companies and banks, and are constantly threatened on any industry that happens to prove successful. The capital gains tax on entrepreneurs has been raised and the business rates relief that was keeping many bars and restaurants afloat has been scaled back. The UK has been turned into a tough place to do business.
The wrong way around
The government is getting this the wrong way around.
Investment in the UK won’t be increased by publishing yet more codes, imposing another set of targets, or bullying pension funds into placing money into a favoured strategy.
It will be increased by making the UK a more attractive place to invest. The government could offer a lower rate of corporation tax for start-ups, or loosen the planning rules for major infrastructure projects, or simply restore the flexibility of the labour market.
The money will flow to the countries where the best returns can be made. Unfortunately, that is not true of the UK right now – and until it is, forcing the pension funds to invest more of their cash in Britain means they will just make lower returns.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Starmer says Britain cannot ignore Russia threat – should you invest in defence?Defence stocks have been enjoying a winning streak since March. As Keir Starmer unveils Britain’s defence spending plan for the next decade, is it time to invest in defence?
-
How to manage a windfall: what to do with a £10,000 lump sumThe FCA has warned wealthy savers they have too much in cash, but beneficiaries of windfalls are still hugging safe havens and losing out
-
'Nationalisation is not the answer'Opinion Labour's enthusiasm for nationalising steel was met with approval across the spectrum. Political consensus is a sign that thinking has been abandoned, says Max King
-
Why did the government take over British Steel – and was it a good idea?The government has stepped in to take control, not ownership, of British Steel, citing national security and other factors. But does that make sense?
-
What caused the Birmingham bin strike – and what does it mean for British businesses?The Birmingham bin strike is the fallout from an equal-pay claim brought by female cleaners. That bodes ill for the rest of British business
-
Supersonic travel: How China could 'leapfrog' US and Europe's commercial aviation industryOpinion Innovation in commercial aviation has been stuck for 60 years. A commercial supersonic jet might be back on the market soon, but will China get there first?
-
How British businesses can tackle Trump's tariffsThe majority of British businesses are likely to take a hit from the chaos caused by Trump’s tariffs to reorder global trade. Companies in the firing line face some difficult decisions, says David Prosser
-
Trump wants to colonise Mars – will it happen?Donald Trump wants to plant the US flag on Mars. Could humans really live there?
-
A new wealth tax is a terrible idea. The rich are already being hit by sneaky taxes – Merryn Somerset WebbOpinion Ideologues want to squeeze more tax out of the rich with a wealth tax. They’re already wrung dry, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
Why are energy bills so expensive in the UK?Electricity bills in the UK are higher than in any comparable rich country. Some blame the net-zero zealotry of the government for that. What is really to blame for high energy bills?
