The most obvious narrative for future economic historians probably goes something like this. In the early 21st century, politicians lost control of spending. Debt rose much faster than GDP. Then, inflation made it much harder for central banks to continue printing money. But as soon as inflation moderated, in 2024, they went back to their old habits – lowering interest rates and inducing more and more people to borrow and spend.
By then, lowering interest rates was no longer an option – it was a necessity. The authorities needed low rates to finance and re-finance their runaway deficits. But investors became reluctant to lend more money to a borrower who was clearly going broke. Interest rates rose and the only recourse was to print money – trillions. The result was more inflation – the defining feature of the 2024-2034 period.
The International Monetary Fund reports that governments are creating a “$100 trillion fiscal time bomb”. When government bases its fiscal policy on large quantities of printed money, the system becomes unstable. There is no strategy the feds can use to defuse the bomb.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
In plain English, if they continue printing more and more dollars, people will soon want no more dollars. They’ll look for alternatives. A “time bomb” is only useful if it blows up. And a crime must have a victim. People – not wanting to get blown up – seek shelter. This is the problem the US Federal Reserve will face in the future, as a report from the Minnesota Fed, entitled Unique Implementation of Permanent Primary Deficits?, understands. Governments can only run permanent budget deficits if there is no escape route into bitcoins, so they must be banned or taxed to death.
In 1971, a saver might have worked hard his entire career to lay aside $100,000. By 2024, that would have been devalued by about 90%. He was cheated out of $90,000. That’s why an inflationary system is unstable. People try to protect themselves. If they succeed, the policy fails. Or, to put it differently, inflation is just an underhanded way to tax people. But it only works as long as someone “pays” the tax. Let’s imagine a “revolt of the masses”. Alert to the scam, and seeing more and more debt, and more and more money printing, consumers might switch to gold or bitcoin, instead. Then, the government is forced into the “balanced budget trap”, because it can no longer borrow at reasonable rates and no one wants its printed currency.
As for the US, the rich can easily switch out of dollar-dependent assets and into stocks, commodity, gold or property funds. But what about consumers? Couldn’t they just move to bitcoin to avoid the inflation tax? No wonder some are beginning to ponder banning it.
Sign up to Bill’s newsletter at bonnerprivateresearch.com.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
How to pay in a chequeReceiving or writing a cheque has become much less common in recent years as instant bank transfers have grown in popularity. Amid widespread bank branch closures, we explain what to do if you get a cheque, and how you can pay one into your bank account.
-
Crypto assets of seven million UK investors at risk – how to keep yours safeCryptocurrency wallet rules make it hard to track down assets after someone has died, even if they leave a will saying who they would like to inherit them
-
8 of the best properties for sale with kitchen gardensThe best properties for sale with kitchen gardens – from a 17th-century timber-framed hall house in Norfolk, to an Arts & Crafts house in West Sussex designed by Charles Voysey with a garden by Gertrude Jekyll
-
Why investors can no longer trust traditional statistical indicatorsOpinion The statistical indicators and data investors have relied on for decades are no longer fit for purpose. It's time to move on, says Helen Thomas
-
Investors rediscover the virtue of value investing over growthGrowth investing, betting on rapidly expanding companies, has proved successful since 2008. But now the other main investment style seems to be coming back into fashion.
-
8 of the best properties for sale with shooting estatesThe best properties for sale with shooting estates – from an estate in a designated Dark Sky area in Ayrshire, Scotland, to a hunting estate in Tuscany with a wild boar, mouflon, deer and hare shoot
-
The most likely outcome of the AI boom is a big fallOpinion Like the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, AI is not paying off – despite huge investments being made in the hope of creating AI-based wealth
-
What we can learn from Britain’s "Dashing Dozen" stocksStocks that consistently outperform the market are clearly doing something right. What can we learn from the UK's top performers and which ones are still buys?
-
The rise of Robin Zeng: China’s billionaire battery kingRobin Zeng, a pioneer in EV batteries, is vying with Li Ka-shing for the title of Hong Kong’s richest person. He is typical of a new kind of tycoon in China
-
Europe’s forgotten equities offer value, growth and strong cash flowsOpinion Jonathon Regis, co-portfolio manager, Developed Markets UCITS Strategy, Lansdowne Partners, highlights forgotten equities he'd put his money in
