Hardly a day goes by without one whizzy technology company or another announcing it is trying out new ways of working, or experimenting with staff benefits. Last week Atom Bank, a techbased challenger to the traditional highstreet lenders, said it was pressing ahead with a four-day week, and that it was getting overwhelmed with applications. Other companies are experimenting with unlimited holiday time, or wellness classes. Or with a work-from-anywhere policy, allowing staff not just to work from home, but to travel around the world, logging into their laptops from a beach. Or indeed with sabbaticals, allowing people to regularly take six months or a year off before coming back to the office. The range of perks is expanding all the time. The old four weeks’ holiday and free lunch in the work canteen seems very modest by comparison.
Money instils discipline
Many tech companies, and start-ups in particular, are critically dependent on some very highly skilled individuals, especially in areas such as coding, marketing and design. They may well have to offer attractive packages to recruit the right people and retain them. The problem is that the most generous employers have one thing in common. It isn’t that they care more about their staff than other employers, or that the people in charge are more generous, caring people. It is that they don’t actually have to worry about making any money.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The inflation in perks increasingly comes from one sector – the venture-capital-backed start-ups. Take Atom Bank, which is leading the push for a four-day working week. It has raised more than £100m in fresh funding over the past year and reported a loss of more than £30m last year, although it says it is now profitable on an operating basis. Or take Revolut, another financial technology company, which has been making a splash by allowing staff to work from abroad for two months a year. It lost more than £200m last year, and although it is making progress towards profitability, it is not there yet.
Klarna, the buy-now-pay-later start-up, has a flexible work policy that allows its people to work from anywhere, but its valuation has fallen from $45bn to less than $7bn. The list goes on. The firms that have the most “progressive” employment policies are also the ones that have raised, and are often still raising, tons of money from investors. That risks undermining the work ethic. It is easy to prioritise wellness and work-life balance when you don’t have the grind of reporting quarterly profits to deal with and there is always another few hundred million pounds that can be raised in the next funding round. But it makes it increasingly hard for normal businesses – which, after all, do need to make money or go bust – to operate. A handful of highprofile companies are setting a standard and attracting headlines with generous benefits, but it is very hard for rivals to compete with that without damaging the bottom line.
Henry Ford didn’t WFH
Starting up a new business should be a passionate, all-consuming endeavour. It should be a 24/7 mission that is demanding on everyone’s time, but ultimately rewarding when it finally pays off. If staff have to be attracted, they can always be offered generous share options. But working four days a week from a beach while planning the next sabbatical doesn’t sound like the foundation for a great new business. That is not how Henry Ford built his car business, or how Steve Jobs or Bill Gates got started in the computer industry. And it is not how countless entrepreneurs for hundreds of years have managed to get an idea off the ground. The venture-capital industry should stop paying for all this – before it loses a ton of money on companies where people have forgotten what hard work is.
-
Are wealthy whisky enthusiasts leaving Britain?Collectables Wealthy whisky enthusiasts are heading to tax-friendly countries such as Dubai, where there is more disposable income to spend on collectable luxuries like rare whisky.
-
Zoopla: Property tax speculation creates uncertainty for a third of home buyersProperty tax rumours could impact homes valued at over £500,000, potentially triggering a housing market slowdown, Zoopla has warned
-
The financial crisis in UK universities – what can be done?UK universities are running out of cash and have begun to shed staff; bankruptcies look likely. What’s gone wrong, and what should be done about it?
-
'Governments are launching an assault on the independence of central banks'Opinion Say goodbye to the era of central bank orthodoxy and hello to the new era of central bank dependency, says Jeremy McKeown
-
Why investors can no longer trust traditional statistical indicatorsOpinion The statistical indicators and data investors have relied on for decades are no longer fit for purpose. It's time to move on, says Helen Thomas
-
The most likely outcome of the AI boom is a big fallOpinion Like the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, AI is not paying off – despite huge investments being made in the hope of creating AI-based wealth
-
The rise of Robin Zeng: China’s billionaire battery kingRobin Zeng, a pioneer in EV batteries, is vying with Li Ka-shing for the title of Hong Kong’s richest person. He is typical of a new kind of tycoon in China
-
How retail investors can gain exposure to Lloyd’s of LondonIt’s hard for retail investors to get in on the action at Lloyd’s of London. Here are some of the ways to gain exposure
-
The goal of business is not profit, but virtueOpinion Serve your customers well, and the profits will follow, according to a new book. It rarely works the other way around, says Stuart Watkins
-
Earnings estimates are a rigged game – especially in the USThe number of US stocks beating earnings estimates tells us only that guidance has deliberately been set too low
