“We’re gonna have growth like we’ve never seen before,” says Donald Trump. Growth! Growth! Growth! More jobs! More income! Abundance! Joy, from coast to coast! We know we’re on the road to joy when we see the GDP numbers. They’ll tell us when we are getting what we want – more of everything.
The two parties agree about it. With the advent of the new “abundance” doctrine – the subject of a new book popular with policymakers in the US – growth is the Jehovah now worshipped by the Democrats. The Republicans regard it as their Yahweh too – ever since the virgin birth of “supply-side economics” in the 1970s.
At the same time, the Senate has passed a version of the Big, Beautiful Budget Abomination, with vice-president J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The Senate version goes even further into the heart of fiscal darkness than the House version. The numbers are fishy, but it looks like it will add $26 trillion to the nation’s debt by 2035. “Don’t worry about it,” say the Republicans. “Growth will make the debt irrelevant.”
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
This is the core problem with government projects. We only know if things are worth doing when and if people – of their own free will and with their own real money – pay for them. Otherwise, the transaction is likely to be a scam or a mistake. Ultimately, citizens pay for all of the feds’ bamboozles. But the signal from voters to federal spenders passes through so many lobbyists, grifters and statistical illusions that it loses its information content.
Even if the voters approve of a spending programme, they’re only better off if it produces a real gain. If a hunter expends 2,000 calories catching a rabbit with only 1,500 calories of meat, he is worse off. If he continues in this vein, he will die of starvation. Likewise, an enterprise that applies 100 dollars’ worth of time and resources to provide a service worth only $99 has not only lost money, it’s made the world $1 poorer. On the evidence (and the theory), it is almost impossible for central-planning hacks to keep costs down and produce a real gain for the taxpayers. Even programmes that seem to make sense run over budget and get delayed and distorted.
Thanks to the Fed’s fake interest rates and state and federal regulations, for example, housing prices have roughly doubled in the last ten years, while wages rose only about 50%. This has put the average house out of reach for the average household. Another crisis! What to do about it? More “abundance”, more supply side reforms, more growth, more houses? California’s “affordable-housing” initiatives may cost as much as $1 million per unit. That’s growth! But we will all be a little poorer as a result.
For more from Bill, see bonnerprivateresearch.com
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
London claims victory in the Brexit warsOpinion JPMorgan Chase's decision to build a new headquarters in London is a huge vote of confidence and a sign that the City will remain Europe's key financial hub
-
Rachel Reeves's Autumn Budget: What it means for the UKOpinion A directionless and floundering government has ducked the hard choices at the Autumn Budget, says Simon Wilson
-
London claims victory in the Brexit wars
Opinion JPMorgan Chase's decision to build a new headquarters in London is a huge vote of confidence and a sign that the City will remain Europe's key financial hub
-
Reinventing the high street – how to invest in the retailers driving the changeThe high street brands that can make shopping and leisure an enjoyable experience will thrive, says Maryam Cockar
-
The consequences of the Autumn Budget – and what it means for the UK economy
Opinion A directionless and floundering government has ducked the hard choices at the Autumn Budget, says Simon Wilson
-
The global defence boom has moved beyond Europe – here’s how to profitOpinion Tom Bailey, head of research for the Future of Defence Indo-Pac ex-China UCITS ETF, picks three defence stocks where he'd put his money
-
Profit from a return to the office with WorkspaceWorkspace is an unloved play on the real estate investment trust sector as demand for flexible office space rises
-
An “existential crisis” for investment trusts? We’ve heard it all before in the 70sOpinion Those fearing for the future of investment trusts should remember what happened 50 years ago, says Max King
-
No peace dividend in Trump's Ukraine planOpinion An end to fighting in Ukraine will hurt defence shares in the short term, but the boom is likely to continue given US isolationism, says Matthew Lynn
-
Will the internet break – and can we protect it?The internet is a delicate global physical and digital network that can easily be paralysed. Why is that, and what can be done to bolster its defences?
