No peace dividend in Trump's Ukraine plan
An end to fighting in Ukraine will hurt defence shares in the short term, but the boom is likely to continue given US isolationism, says Matthew Lynn
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
Donald Trump’s attempt to hammer out a truce between Russia and Ukraine remains in the balance, but defence shares are already slipping at the prospect of the three years of bitter fighting finally coming to an end. It is not hard to understand why. Defence has been one of the few stars in a generally dismal European economy, with shares soaring on expectations that governments across the continent would spend a lot of money in the years ahead on rebuilding their armed forces.
The big German defence contractors were the stand-out performers on the back of the huge increases in borrowing and spending, much of it directed to the military. Rheinmetall shares were up 170% over the last year, before the latest sell off. Yet with the European Union also planning a €150 billion common defence fund, all the continent’s major companies were expected to get a lot of lucrative contracts. So Italy’s Leonardo had doubled, while France’s Thales was up by more than 70%. Even environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds were starting to invest in the sector.
A ceasefire in Ukraine could change all of that very quickly. Trump is pushing hard for a deal and it will prove hard for Ukraine to hold out against that. The war has reached what looks like a stalemate, with huge losses on both sides. Sure, it would be better if Ukraine could achieve a victory and Vladimir Putin were removed from power in Russia. But there does not seem to be much chance of that happening. An end to fighting would save a lot of lives and might be the best option available. And so investors are right to reassess.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
If there is a peace deal, governments across Western Europe may very quickly go back to spending more money on welfare, or trying to bring their deficits under control and keep the bond markets happy. If there is no security emergency on their doorsteps, it will be hard to persuade voters to keep spending money on defence that could be spent on healthcare, social security or infrastructure instead. That is what they did after the Cold War ended, and it is very easy to think that the same thing will happen again. If it does, the defence giants may find their order books starting to dry up very quickly.
Peace in Ukraine would not end the need to rearm
Even so, there are two reasons why this is not the most likely outcome. To start with, any peace deal will almost certainly include some security guarantees for Ukraine. It is not likely to be allowed to join Nato, but there may well be a peacekeeping force that is drawn from Europe, as well as help for restoring its own armed forces so it can defend itself from further attacks. All of that will mean that money has to be spent on kit for the soldiers who will be keeping an eye on the new border between Russia and its neighbour.
Next, and more importantly, if the Ukraine war is settled, at least for now, then the US will inevitably accelerate its withdrawal from Europe. This had already started under previous presidents, but Trump has made it very clear that the US does not intend carry on paying for the defence of the continent. Trump wants all the major countries to commit to spending 3% or more of their GDP on their armed forces, while the US turns its attention elsewhere. The war in Ukraine has kept America engaged in Europe for the past three years, but without that emergency, it will focus instead on the far larger contest with China for the dominant role in the Pacific. The result? Europe will have to carry on paying much more for its own defence. It won’t have any other choice. Russia will remain a hostile, threatening opponent, and with less support from America, Europe will have to remain in a high state of alert.
European governments, including of course the UK, might want to cut spending – there will be plenty of demand for more spending elsewhere. If the peace holds between Russia and Ukraine, it will be very tempting to make savings. But in reality, that won’t be possible. Military spending will have to keep rising – and that means the boom in defence shares will carry on for many more years to come.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
-
How a ‘great view’ from your home can boost its value by 35%A house that comes with a picturesque backdrop could add tens of thousands of pounds to its asking price – but how does each region compare?
-
What is a care fees annuity and how much does it cost?How we will be cared for in our later years – and how much we are willing to pay for it – are conversations best had as early as possible. One option to cover the cost is a care fees annuity. We look at the pros and cons.
-
Three key winners from the AI boom and beyondJames Harries of the Trojan Global Income Fund picks three promising stocks that transcend the hype of the AI boom
-
RTX Corporation is a strong player in a growth marketRTX Corporation’s order backlog means investors can look forward to years of rising profits
-
Profit from MSCI – the backbone of financeAs an index provider, MSCI is a key part of the global financial system. Its shares look cheap
-
"Botched" Brexit: should Britain rejoin the EU?Brexit did not go perfectly nor disastrously. It’s not worth continuing the fight over the issue, says Julian Jessop
-
'AI is the real deal – it will change our world in more ways than we can imagine'Interview Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates talks to Andrew Van Sickle about the AI bubble, the impact of tariffs on inflation and the outlook for gold and China
-
Should investors join the rush for venture-capital trusts?Opinion Investors hoping to buy into venture-capital trusts before the end of the tax year may need to move quickly, says David Prosser
-
Food and drinks giants seek an image makeover – here's what they're doingThe global food and drink industry is having to change pace to retain its famous appeal for defensive investors. Who will be the winners?
-
Tony Blair's terrible legacy sees Britain still sufferingOpinion Max King highlights ten ways in which Tony Blair's government sowed the seeds of Britain’s subsequent poor performance and many of its current problems