Israel attacks Iran – will the US join the conflict?
The two countries have been exchanging fire since Israel launched air strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and infrastructure on Friday 13 June. But without US involvement, it may only have created a “wounded big beast”


“Donald Trump faced one of the most monumental decisions of his presidency on 17 June as he debated whether to join a war against Iran that risked sucking Washington into a new Middle Eastern conflict but also offered the chance to eliminate a foe’s nuclear programme,” says Michael Birnbaum in The Washington Post.
Posting throughout the day on social media, Trump said the US had “complete and total control of the skies over Iran”, warned Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei that he was an “easy target”, and demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender”. He had hurried home early from the G7 summit in Canada to attend an 80-minute meeting in the White House situation room, after a conversation with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel and Iran have been exchanging fire since 13 June, when Israel launched air strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and infrastructure, shortly after Iran had “brazenly flouted” the two-month deadline Trump had given Iran for engaging in talks, says Newsweek’s Dan Perry.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Long seen as a “mighty power”, Iran’s ambitions for regional dominance “have been destroyed in just five days by a country with a tenth of its population and an 80th of its land mass”, says Adrian Bloomfield in The Telegraph. Most of its missiles have been intercepted while Israel has “wiped out” Iran’s air defences, its drones have destroyed more than 120 ballistic missile launchers, and 11 of Iran’s generals and the country’s top nuclear scientists have been killed. Israel’s attack on its launch sites may have more than halved its missile capacity. Thousands have fled Tehran.
Will Trump join the conflict between Israel and Iran?
Netanyahu’s attack has been years in the making, says William Hague in The Times. The idea that a theocratic regime in Tehran that threatens to destroy other nations should never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons is “sound”. However, Netanyahu’s insistence that “diplomacy could never work” has “severely undermined” efforts by the US and others. Trump abandoned the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in his first term and, although “second-term Trump” has been trying to “stick a deal back together”, Iran now has “far more” enriched uranium. The increasing likelihood of nuclear “breakout” made Israel’s attack easier to justify. It helped that Iran’s key ally, Bashar al-Assad, has fled Syria, and proxies in Lebanon and Gaza have been “hammered by the Israelis”. The Iranian leaders are “cornered.”
Only the US has weapons powerful enough to blow up Iran’s main nuclear site at Fordow, says Roger Boyes in The Times. Without its involvement, Iran, with Russian and Chinese backing, remains a “wounded big beast”. Khamenei has warned of “irreparable harm” if the US military becomes involved. There is also the risk that any intervention that “appears externally driven” backfires, says Dan Perry. The Islamic Republic is run by an “unaccountable clerical elite” which controls its people through censorship and repression, but if Iran’s globally minded citizens “despise” the regime, society remains “deeply nationalistic”.
Civil society is fearful and fragmented, and many people are economically dependent on the state. This means the “most plausible scenario is a palace coup: a rupture within the military”. Trump is averse to protracted military engagements, but the success of Israel’s strikes and his love of “dramatic” wins may incline him to take steps that would allow him to position himself as the “architect of Iran’s ‘freedom moment’”. “At a moment of grave uncertainty, one thing is not in doubt” – Iranians deserve “better than the theocratic prison” to which they’ve been consigned since 1979.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.
Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.
-
Inheritance tax receipts rise by 7% – how to cut your bill
Rising house prices and frozen tax thresholds continue to push inheritance tax bills up and receipts are only likely to rise further
-
Napoleon’s bicorne headgear, the original MAGA hat, could fetch €800,000
Collectables Napoleon would not be out of place in Trump’s America, says Chris Carter
-
US and China reach a ceasefire in their trade war after talks in London
The US and China's trading relationship – the most important one in the global economy – is back on track. Will the truce last?
-
Judicial elections: will Mexico’s bold political experiment come at a cost?
Mexico's historic judicial elections attracted little attention, but the implications could be far-reaching
-
What will the unravelling of US-China trade mean for the economy?
What will a US-China decoupling mean for the global economy?
-
What's next for Liberal Mark Carney after Canadian election win
Mark Carney will remain as Canadian prime minister after winning the country's election, despite falling short of a majority.
-
Could Javier Milei bring Argentina's economy back to 'normal'?
Javier Milei, president of Argentina, has been in office for more than 500 days. What will his leadership mean for the economy?
-
Out of America's shadow: Why Trump's tariff chaos may be good for non-US stocks
Opinion Upending global investment and trade could benefit other countries at the expense of the US market, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Five years on: what did Covid cost us?
We’re still counting the costs of the global coronavirus pandemic – and governments’ responses. What did we learn?
-
Protests erupt in Turkey after the arrest of president Erdogan's rival
Turkey's president has jailed his main political opponent, Ekrem Imamoglu