The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank brings back memories of 2008 – but the risks are different in this cycle.
“Generals are always prepared to fight the last war,” goes the old saying. Investors often make the same error when they face a new crisis.
The frantic way that markets have reacted to the ructions in the US banking sector over the past week shows that many of us still see events through the framework of 2007-2009.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The spillover from the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank
Take the sell-off in European banking stocks on Wednesday that saw trading temporarily halted in BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Monte dei Paschi, Societe Generale, and UniCredit, and also brought a nostalgic return to that late 2000s/early 2010s sport of watching bank credit default swaps (CDS) as Credit Suisse traded “points upfront”. It is striking that the failure of three idiosyncratic banks in the US and yet more headlines about a structurally dysfunctional Swiss bank sparked such a panic.
It’s possible that by the time you read this on Friday, everything may have spiralled into a vast financial meltdown, in which case this analysis will look short-sighted. But my assumption is that investors who use the last crisis as a guide to the next cycle are missing the real lessons.
Another financial crisis is unlikely
Back in the late 2000s, markets took the tech wreck as a blueprint and drew false comfort from it, because the largely equity-funded dotcom didn’t hurt the banking system much. That led them to overlook a crisis built mostly on toxic assets and unstable funding within banks.
The situation today is very different, for reasons that are not simply down to how healthy banks are.
Yes, most institutions are almost certainly more robust than they were in 2007, although it’s hard to be sure what problems could emerge in response to higher interest rates – if we’ve learned one thing about the financial sector, it is that banks make remarkably stupid decisions and then act very surprised when they blow up in a predictable way.
However, the more important change is that 2008 up-ended a lot of established principles about how policymakers will respond. We can see that in what happened this week: quick seizures at Silicon Vally Bank and Signature Bank, depositors protected, and a generous approach to providing liquidity to reduce the risk of future runs.
Banks will be supported, even if shareholders and bondholders are wiped out. While there will be some bad assets in the system, the more fundamental issue is probably assets that may be sound, but are overvalued for a new world in which both inflation and rates are rising – such as long-term bonds.
The most likely scenario is that these correct to more reasonable valuations over a long period of time – eg, like the 1970s. There will be rapid nominal losses for anybody who’s forced to sell and an even more insidious risk of slow, real-terms losses for investors who hold them to maturity.
More from MoneyWeek:
The highest yielding S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
The platinum price could double as demand takes off
The cybersecurity stocks to buy as the sector booms
-
Chase restricts cashback in blow for current account customersChase Bank is making its cashback deal less generous from 7 April. We explain what’s changing
-
Would capping cash ISAs help close the gender investment gap?Opinion If cash ISAs are capped, will more women will start investing? Kalpana Fitzpatrick looks at why women don't invest as much as men and what could help them start
-
Trapped in a time of zombie governmentIt’s not just companies that are eking out an existence, says Max King. The state is in the twilight zone too.
-
America is in deep denial over debtThe downgrade in America’s credit rating was much criticised by the US government, says Alex Rankine. But was it a long time coming?
-
Bank of England raises interest rates to 5.25%The Bank has hiked rates from 5% to 5.25%, marking the 14th increase in a row. We explain what it means for savers and homeowners - and whether more rate rises are on the horizon
-
UK inflation remains at 8.7% ‒ what it means for your moneyInflation was unmoved at 8.7% in the 12 months to May. What does this ‘sticky’ rate of inflation mean for your money?
-
VICE bankruptcy: how did it happen?Was the VICE bankruptcy inevitable? We look into how the once multibillion-dollar came crashing down.
-
Would a food price cap actually work?Analysis The government is discussing plans to cap the prices of essentials. But could this intervention do more harm than good?
-
UK inflation slides to 8.7% - what does it mean for your money?News Inflation has dropped below 10% for the first time in months, but with food prices at a 45-year high, is this good news and what does it mean for your money?
-
Why the UK equity market is shrinkingAnalysis The crisis has been building for 25 years, says Max King, and it will take decades to reverse the trend.
