America is in deep denial over debt

The downgrade in America’s credit rating was much criticised by the US government, says Alex Rankine. But was it a long time coming?

Low angle view of Federal Reserve Building, Washington DC
(Image credit: Getty Images)

A downgrade in America’s credit rating is “absolutely merited” given Washington’s “wildly reckless overspending”, says Stephen Miran in the National Review. Last week credit-rating agency Fitch cut the US government’s credit rating one notch from AAA to AA+, citing “a high and growing general government debt burden, and the erosion of governance” after June’s stand-off in Congress over the debt ceiling, which brought America close to default.  

Fitch is the second of the big three rating agencies to have cut the US rating from the AAA “gold standard”, says Rafael Nam on NPR. S&P Global took a similar step in 2011. Just nine countries retain an AAA rating from all three agencies. The public debt-to-GDP ratio in these nations averages 39%, compared with 112% in America. 

The market impact was limited as the downgrade contained “no new information”, say DWS’s analysts in a note. The move was “oddly timed”: it would have made sense for Fitch to act earlier this year when the debt-ceiling fight loomed. Yet Fitch is right to warn that the “policies currently in place put the US on an unsustainable path”.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Howls of protest

Fitch’s decision to move America from “outstanding” to merely “excellent” provoked wails of protest, says Irwin Stelzer in The Sunday Times. Jason Furman, formerly of the Obama administration, complained that the downgrade was “completely absurd”, with former Treasury secretary Larry Summers labelling it “bizarre and inept”. Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued that “the American economy is fundamentally strong”. She’s right, which is why continuing to run annual deficits in excess of 5% is indefensible, says Stelzer. While an outright default seems improbable – “Treasury printing presses guarantee that there will always be sufficient dollars” to pay US debts – a “de facto default, paying debt obligations in wildly depreciated dollars” is no longer unthinkable.  

Fitch’s move is a political judgement, says Gillian Tett in the Financial Times. “Even if Washington can theoretically pay its bills and cut its debt, that does not mean it actually will”. Politics are so “polarised that it is hard to imagine Congress taking the sensible steps needed to tackle America’s fiscal problems”. The US has no plan for getting its borrowing under control, says Szu Ping Chan in The Telegraph. The “world’s biggest economy is expected to borrow 5.8% of GDP this year”, according to the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Alarmingly, “deficits are... projected to average 7.3% of GDP every year for the next 30 years, more than double the average over the past half-century”. 

The CBO says that in the past century “deficits have been that large only during World War II and the pandemic”.  

Interest on the federal debt will hit $663bn this fiscal year and is “fast approaching the size of the military budget”, says Michael Lewitt in The Credit Strategist newsletter. David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research calculates that within a decade annual interest payments will be worth over 20% of federal government revenues, compared with 9% before Covid. Fitch’s downgrade is “a wake-up call to the political class” that “America needs to get its fiscal house in order”.

Explore More
Markets editor

Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019. 

Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere. 

He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful. 

Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.