The directors of the Schroder UK Growth investment trust recently fired their fund manager. The trust's assets will be moved to Baillie Gifford; a new high-conviction, focused, "best ideas" strategy will be implemented; and the trust will be renamed the Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund.
This makes sense. A trust's directors are there to look out for the interests of shareholders, which involves ensuring they are getting value from the fund managers they use. Schroders didn't appear to be doing a particularly brilliant job. Despite the trust's name, it has long focused more on value than growth stocks (think Shell and Lloyds), which hasn't been working the trust has underperformed the FTSE All-Share over three and five years and the shares have traded at a nasty discount to net asset value. There is also every reason to think that Baillie Gifford, a genuine growth investor, could do a brilliant job (its record is impressive, as MoneyWeek readers invested in Scottish Mortgage will know) and new managers Iain McCombie and Milena Mileva plan to completely revamp the portfolio. It's hard to find much to criticise, especially as the discount has all but halved since the news broke.
Yet it still makes me feel a tiny bit uneasy. Look back to the accounts that this trust published in April 2000, just as the great technology boom was about to come to a very nasty end. The directors were settling on a change of strategy. Given the "growing importance of high-growth stocks to the UK stockmarket, particularly those in technology-related areas", they concluded that the fund was "too heavily biased towards stocks in out-of-favour, lowly rated companies known as value stocks". That, said the chairman, was to be reversed. This was a horrible decision. The Nasdaq peaked in March, and by the time the directors published their report, the game was already up.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It won't be quite the same this time: valuations aren't super-extreme and Baillie Gifford is a responsible growth investor (you won't find the types of fantasy firms that were popular in late 1999 in its portfolios). However, technology stocks have outperformed hugely, and growth valuations are stretched. That might make anyone who thinks the biggest driver of long-term returns is the price you pay when you buy (that's us) notice the relative value in the healthcare, banking and energy sectors (the very ones Schroders was in). For more on ways into this market, see this week's cover story, while Max King reckons now is exactly the time to buy out-of-favour, lowly valued stocks!
Finally, some news. MoneyWeek is looking for a managing editor to work with John Stepek and me to oversee the commissioning, editing and production of the magazine on a weekly basis as well as to help shape our long-term future. If you are interested, or know someone who should be, please get in touch.
-
The higher earners targeted for tax rises – and how they could be hit in Autumn BudgetFrozen income tax thresholds and the high cost of housing is squeezing many Britons, and their finances could suffer from further tax hikes aimed at the wealthy
-
Unloved alternative trusts are going cheap – should you buy?Opinion Alternative trusts like infrastructure and real estate funds are trading at huge discounts. Investors should take advantage, says Rupert Hargreaves
-
What to do as the age of cheap money and overpriced equities endsEditor's letter The age of cheap money, overpriced equities and negative interest rates is over. The great bond bull market is over. All this means you will be losing money, says Merryn Somerset Webb. What can you do to protect yourself?
-
Investors are bullish – but be very carefulEditor's letter Many investors are buying the dip, convinced the latest upswing is the start of a new bull market. The odds are that it’s not, says Andrew Van Sickle. The bear has unfinished business.
-
The MoneyWeek approach to investingEditor's letter At MoneyWeek, our aim is simple: to give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories, and tell you how to profit from them. So how do we do that?
-
Celebrity bitcoin ads echo the subprime mortgage crisisEditor's letter A wave of ads featuring celebrities punting crypto to the masses are reminiscent of how low income Americans were encouraged to take on loans they couldn’t afford, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Will the UK's property slowdown turn into a house-price crash?Editor's letter As the cost-of-living crisis intensifies and interest rate rise, it is hard to see reasons for UK house prices to keep rising, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
What sardines can teach investors about today's marketsEditor's letter A California tale of “eating sardines” and “trading sardines” can help us divide investments into speculative and real, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Something that's very useful when looking at today’s markets.
-
The market finally seems to be getting itEditor's letter Reality checks are coming fast to the markets, says Merryn Somerset Webb – with even 2022’s safe havens beginning to reflect recession worries.
-
Remember Woodford, and make sure you can cash outEditor's letter Investing is full of risks. But not being able to sell your investment when you want to is one you shouldn't have to deal with, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
