For many years, lifestyle funds were a popular option with savers in stakeholder, personal and many defined-contribution workplace pension plans. The funds invest your money relatively aggressively while you’re younger, channelling your contributions into equities with the aim of building as large a pension fund as possible. Then, five to ten years before you’re due to retire, your provider automatically begins to switch your money into assets conventionally considered less risky: bonds and gilts, in particular. When you finish work, your fund will be almost entirely invested in these assets.
The principle of a lifestyle fund is that savers closing in on retirement should not be exposed to the risk of a sudden drop in the value of their fund since they won’t have time to make up the shortfall. Bonds, which have traditionally offered much less volatile returns than other asset classes, therefore appear to be a good option.
The problem is that in the past two to three years, bonds have not lived up to their promise of low volatility. As interest rates have risen to tackle inflation, bond prices have fallen sharply. Some bond funds have suffered losses of 30% to 40% over the past year alone.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
That has proved disastrous for savers with lifestyle funds who are just coming up to retirement. Their savings have crashed at the worst possible moment – exactly the danger that these funds were supposed to avert. And while savers may be furious, they have little redress. Their money has been invested in line with the premise of the lifestyle fund. They have simply been caught out by unusual market conditions.
The problem is that bonds have not lived up to their promise of low volatility
It’s not all bad news. Higher interest rates also mean increasing annuity rates. So, for savers now intending to convert their savings into regular income by buying an annuity, there will be some compensation from the fact that their money will go further. However, for most lifestyle fund savers, the additional annuity income now available will be nowhere near enough to compensate for the fall in the value of their savings. They now face difficult choices. Do they delay retiring, or at least cashing in their pension, in the hope of a bond-market recovery? Another option might be to delay and shift funds into more aggressive assets, but that will lock in the bond fund losses and add even further exposure to risk.
The story is a painful reminder of the long-term nature of pension planning and the importance of checking regularly to see whether your strategy remains appropriate. For many years, lifestyle funds worked very well and provided important protection – but the financial environment then changed.
There will be many savers in lifestyle funds who have yet to be affected by this issue because they are young enough still to be invested predominantly in equities. But it is important that they learn from the problems suffered by less fortunate older savers – a savings strategy that automatically shifts your money around, rather than requiring direct and considered intervention, is always going to leave you exposed.
There is, in any case, a real question mark over whether lifestyle funds are fit for purpose in modern times. The concept was designed for an era in which most savers bought an annuity at retirement, ending the savings period of their retirement planning. These days, most savers prefer to draw an income directly from their pension funds, which are left invested. In which case, shifting all your money into bonds may make no sense at all.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related articles
- Everything you need to know about pensions
- The 4% pension rule to retire comfortably
- How to protect your pension pot from market turmoil
-
Pension warning: one in five don’t know how much is going into their pensionHow to check your pension contributions and why it matters
-
50,000 power of attorney applications rejected – how to avoid common mistakesA freedom of information request shows that thousands of lasting power of attorney (LPA) applications are rejected due to errors. We explain how to avoid mistakes and reveal tips to make the process as straightforward as possible
-
Is it cheaper to be a sole trader?It might be cheaper to be a sole trader due to changes to the tax system
-
Should you switch your pension fund?Many pension fund options are poor performers, thanks partly to high charges. Is it worth switching?
-
The best fintech apps on the marketFrom digital banking to investment platforms, here are the top fintech apps on the market right now, according to David C. Stevenson
-
What pension providers don't tell you about your retirement moneyCheck the small print from your pension provider or risk losing thousands.
-
Britain’s stifling tax burdenChancellor Jeremy Hunt's Autumn Statement will see the tax burden rise in each of the next 5 years.
-
Brace for a year of tax risesThe government is strapped for cash, so prepare for tax rises. But it’s unlikely to be able to squeeze much more out of us.
-
Lock in high yields on savings, before they disappearAs interest rates peak, time to lock in high yields on your savings, while they are still available.
-
How inflation will hit your pension savingsAnalysis Many pension schemes that offer protection from price rises may not be as good as they seem.
