The mistakes pharmaceutical companies made with their Covid vaccines
Covid-19 looked as if it would mark the start of a golden age for the pharmaceutical industry. It’s not worked out that way, says Matthew Lynn.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
Rewind only a year, and it seemed reasonable to assume that Covid-19 would transform the prospects of the major pharmaceutical multinationals.
Three safe and effective vaccines were developed in a year; regulators worked at record speed to get them approved and governments pre-bought doses in the millions to ramp up production – perhaps the same would happen for a whole range of other diseases.
Investors started pouring money into both the established giants and the biotech start-ups on the promise that the industry was about to enter a new golden era.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What went wrong?
True, a lot of money has been made over the last couple of years. Pfizer’s jab, the most widely used, has been a blockbuster, delivering annualised sales of $37bn, almost doubling its turnover, and turning the jab into the biggest pharmaceutical product in the world. Moderna and AstraZeneca did not make quite so much, but still chalked up nine-digit revenues for their vaccines.
And yet, despite that, there is not much sign that progress can be sustained – the share prices of many of the main players have been tumbling. True, the wider stockmarket has also been weak, especially for innovative, technology-based companies, but even so, there is no escaping the fact that Covid-19 is not turning into a catalyst for rapid growth in the industry. No one is making a fortune out of Covid-19 anymore.
There were three big issues. First, the Omicron variant was more infectious, but at least somewhat milder than the Delta variant, and it only partly evaded existing vaccines. There was almost no way of stopping it from spreading, but fortunately very few vaccinated people who caught it required hospitalisation. Sure, it was still sensible to get vaccinated, and to get a booster as well, but the demand for the jabs inevitably started to wane. Flu vaccines are a major product, but in reality most people don’t bother because they are not that worried about catching it. As 2022 unfolded, Omicron meant Covid-19 was starting to go the same way.
Next, vaccination kills its own market. It is a paradox of developing and manufacturing vaccines that, the more successful they are, the less demand there ends up being. At the most extreme level, the disease is completely wiped out so that no one needs to worry about it anymore: polio has been largely eliminated from the developed world and measles and mumps have been tamed. Some of the drug companies are pushing for annualised vaccination against Covid-19, especially for the elderly or vulnerable, but it is starting to look as if two or three jabs will be enough. Almost all of us have been vaccinated now, and that means the demand isn’t there any longer.
Too greedy for their own good
Finally, and most importantly, the firms were too greedy. The AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine was the obvious exception, sold at cost price, but Moderna and Pfizer both pushed for very high prices, charging health systems as much as $30 per jab.
That now looks to have been a critical mistake; the wealthy countries could afford it, but the vaccines were unaffordable for many others, and countries have relied on home-grown alternatives, or opted for herd immunity instead. Even worse, it fuelled demands for the companies to be stripped of patent protection. It would have been far better to charge just two or three dollars per jab and make sure the whole world was vaccinated. Instead, the companies put short-term profits over building a long-term business.
The virus might bounce back. Hong Kong is in the middle of a full-blown epidemic and there are signs it is spreading across mainland China. If China were willing to admit its own vaccines were not very effective, and ordered the Pfizer or AstraZeneca jabs instead, that would revive the market. Otherwise, the boom has fizzled out. The pharma industry may have imagined it was going to make a fortune from the virus and start a new golden era of innovation. It has not worked out that way – and the industry looks stuck with modest growth at best for a long time to come.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
-
Average income tax by area: The parts of the UK paying the most tax mappedThe UK’s total income tax bill was £240.7 billion 2022/23, but the tax burden is not spread equally around the country. We look at the towns and boroughs that have the highest average income tax bill.
-
BBC TV licence fee hike confirmed: can you reduce how much you pay?The cost of a TV licence fee is set to rise by over 3%, but there are ways to reduce the bill.
-
Three key winners from the AI boom and beyondJames Harries of the Trojan Global Income Fund picks three promising stocks that transcend the hype of the AI boom
-
RTX Corporation is a strong player in a growth marketRTX Corporation’s order backlog means investors can look forward to years of rising profits
-
Profit from MSCI – the backbone of financeAs an index provider, MSCI is a key part of the global financial system. Its shares look cheap
-
'AI is the real deal – it will change our world in more ways than we can imagine'Interview Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates talks to Andrew Van Sickle about the AI bubble, the impact of tariffs on inflation and the outlook for gold and China
-
Should investors join the rush for venture-capital trusts?Opinion Investors hoping to buy into venture-capital trusts before the end of the tax year may need to move quickly, says David Prosser
-
Food and drinks giants seek an image makeover – here's what they're doingThe global food and drink industry is having to change pace to retain its famous appeal for defensive investors. Who will be the winners?
-
Barings Emerging Europe trust bounces back from Russia woesBarings Emerging Europe trust has added the Middle East and Africa to its mandate, delivering a strong recovery, says Max King
-
How a dovish Federal Reserve could affect youTrump’s pick for the US Federal Reserve is not so much of a yes-man as his rival, but interest rates will still come down quickly, says Cris Sholto Heaton