The mistakes pharmaceutical companies made with their Covid vaccines
Covid-19 looked as if it would mark the start of a golden age for the pharmaceutical industry. It’s not worked out that way, says Matthew Lynn.


Rewind only a year, and it seemed reasonable to assume that Covid-19 would transform the prospects of the major pharmaceutical multinationals.
Three safe and effective vaccines were developed in a year; regulators worked at record speed to get them approved and governments pre-bought doses in the millions to ramp up production – perhaps the same would happen for a whole range of other diseases.
Investors started pouring money into both the established giants and the biotech start-ups on the promise that the industry was about to enter a new golden era.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What went wrong?
True, a lot of money has been made over the last couple of years. Pfizer’s jab, the most widely used, has been a blockbuster, delivering annualised sales of $37bn, almost doubling its turnover, and turning the jab into the biggest pharmaceutical product in the world. Moderna and AstraZeneca did not make quite so much, but still chalked up nine-digit revenues for their vaccines.
And yet, despite that, there is not much sign that progress can be sustained – the share prices of many of the main players have been tumbling. True, the wider stockmarket has also been weak, especially for innovative, technology-based companies, but even so, there is no escaping the fact that Covid-19 is not turning into a catalyst for rapid growth in the industry. No one is making a fortune out of Covid-19 anymore.
There were three big issues. First, the Omicron variant was more infectious, but at least somewhat milder than the Delta variant, and it only partly evaded existing vaccines. There was almost no way of stopping it from spreading, but fortunately very few vaccinated people who caught it required hospitalisation. Sure, it was still sensible to get vaccinated, and to get a booster as well, but the demand for the jabs inevitably started to wane. Flu vaccines are a major product, but in reality most people don’t bother because they are not that worried about catching it. As 2022 unfolded, Omicron meant Covid-19 was starting to go the same way.
Next, vaccination kills its own market. It is a paradox of developing and manufacturing vaccines that, the more successful they are, the less demand there ends up being. At the most extreme level, the disease is completely wiped out so that no one needs to worry about it anymore: polio has been largely eliminated from the developed world and measles and mumps have been tamed. Some of the drug companies are pushing for annualised vaccination against Covid-19, especially for the elderly or vulnerable, but it is starting to look as if two or three jabs will be enough. Almost all of us have been vaccinated now, and that means the demand isn’t there any longer.
Too greedy for their own good
Finally, and most importantly, the firms were too greedy. The AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine was the obvious exception, sold at cost price, but Moderna and Pfizer both pushed for very high prices, charging health systems as much as $30 per jab.
That now looks to have been a critical mistake; the wealthy countries could afford it, but the vaccines were unaffordable for many others, and countries have relied on home-grown alternatives, or opted for herd immunity instead. Even worse, it fuelled demands for the companies to be stripped of patent protection. It would have been far better to charge just two or three dollars per jab and make sure the whole world was vaccinated. Instead, the companies put short-term profits over building a long-term business.
The virus might bounce back. Hong Kong is in the middle of a full-blown epidemic and there are signs it is spreading across mainland China. If China were willing to admit its own vaccines were not very effective, and ordered the Pfizer or AstraZeneca jabs instead, that would revive the market. Otherwise, the boom has fizzled out. The pharma industry may have imagined it was going to make a fortune from the virus and start a new golden era of innovation. It has not worked out that way – and the industry looks stuck with modest growth at best for a long time to come.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg, and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
He has written books on finance and financial topics, including Bust: Greece, The Euro and The Sovereign Debt Crisis and The Long Depression: The Slump of 2008 to 2031. Matthew is also the author of the Death Force series of military thrillers and the founder of Lume Books, an independent publisher.
-
Unloved alternative trusts are going cheap – should you buy?
Opinion Alternative trusts like infrastructure and real estate funds are trading at huge discounts. Investors should take advantage, says Rupert Hargreaves
-
Trump eyes private foundations to raise tax. Will philanthropy decline?
The picture is mixed, but philanthropy on the whole is alive and well, says Simon Wilson
-
Infrastructure investing: a haven of stable growth amid market turmoil
From booming construction in emerging markets to digital and green transitions, the infrastructure sector offers security, returns and long-term opportunities
-
The costly myth of “sell in May”
Opinion May 2025's strong returns for US stocks have once again shown that putting too much weight on seasonal patterns will only make investors poorer, says Max King
-
Vietnam: a high-growth market going cheap
Opinion The threat of tariffs has shaken Vietnamese stocks, but long-term prospects remain solid, says Max King
-
Who’s driving Tesla?
As Elon Musk steps back from government with his eyes on the stars, investors ask if he’s still behind the wheel at his electric-car maker.
-
Cash in on the biotech boom with three promising European picks
Opinion Ailsa Craig and Marek Poszepczynski, portfolio managers at the International Biotechnology Trust, tell MoneyWeek where they’d put their money
-
Investment opportunities in the world of Coca-Cola
There is far more to Coca-Cola than just one giant firm. The companies that bottle and distribute the ubiquitous soft drink are promising investments in their own right.
-
Streaming services are the new magic money tree for investors – but for how long?
Opinion Streaming services are in full bloom and laden with profits, but beware – winter is coming, warns Matthew Lynn
-
'Pension funds shouldn't be pushed into private equity sector'
Opinion The private-equity party is over, so don't push pension funds into the sector, says Merryn Somerset Webb.