The lessons of “Operation Warp Speed” – the race to produce a vaccine

Clarity of purpose was a major factor in producing an effective vaccine

(Image credit: © Allan Carvalho/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

published 13 December 2020

The creation, approval and large-scale manufacturing of a Covid-19 vaccine in less than a year is among the most notable scientific and technological achievements in history. Led by Operation Warp Speed in the US, and with similar initiatives in other countries, including the UK, vast scientific resources have been mobilised to crack a huge global crisis. The effort has succeeded magnificently.

What governments got right

Governments around the world got plenty wrong in their response to the virus. But they got one thing right. They threw a lot of money at getting a vaccine. In the US, Operation Warp Speed was given a budget of $10bn to distribute to anyone who might be able to help. In this country, government help was available for the Oxford and Imperial vaccines, and the same was true in Russia, China and across much of the developed world.

Just as significantly, by pre-ordering vaccines on a vast scale, governments guaranteed a market for any company that could produce an effective jab. The billions spent might seem like a lot of money, but it was peanuts, of course, compared to the vast cost of coping with the epidemic. It was money well spent. The interesting question, however, is this. What can any company, or indeed government, learn from the success of that project? Here are four places to start.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

The companies and research institutes working on creating a vaccine didn’t have to worry about diversity, market share, delivering value for different stakeholders or governance structures. In fact, they didn’t have to worry about anything other than the single overriding purpose of devising a safe and effective jab as fast as possible. Clarity of purpose makes a huge difference. We expect businesses to deliver a range of economic, social, and environmental goals, and while they might all be worthwhile, it is often more effective to have just a single objective and concentrate completely on it. It gets results.

University research institutes have contributed hugely to the scientific work – especially Oxford and Imperial – but most of the work has been done in the private sector. Pfizer didn’t even take the money on offer from the US government because it didn’t want its scientist to be bogged down in politics and targets. Instead, patent rights have been preserved and companies are being paid standard commercial rates for the vaccines despite pressure for it all to be taken under state control. The result? Businesses have had plenty of incentives to create a vaccine, and to put in place all the infrastructure to deliver it to hundreds of millions of people because they can make money from doing so. It is very simple – but it works every time.

New medicines usually get created step by step. It takes a year or two to develop a drug, then another couple of years to do the trials, then a year or so for approvals, and then another year to get the factories ready and get it into the medical system. So it can be a decade before the product is on the market. If tests are done at the same time as factories are prepared, however, it can all happen much faster. From infrastructure projects to consumer goods there are lessons in that for every kind of product. Sure, it costs more, but if it makes everything happen faster, then it might be worth it.

Finally, accelerate regulation too. Whatever the anti-vaxxers might say, there is no evidence that there have been any compromises on the safety trials for the Covid-19 vaccines. But the regulatory checks have been sped up. Instead of waiting for every test to be completed, and a huge dossier to be compiled, regulators have constantly monitored the vaccine candidates as their trials were completed. The result? They could approve drugs far more quickly. Other regulatory agencies could learn from that. Lots of industries, from finance to telecoms to the media, need supervision – but it doesn’t need to slow everything down as much as it does.

Explore More

Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg, and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.

He has written books on finance and financial topics, including Bust: Greece, The Euro and The Sovereign Debt Crisis and The Long Depression: The Slump of 2008 to 2031. Matthew is also the author of the Death Force series of military thrillers and the founder of Lume Books, an independent publisher.