Gold could set new records, even from here – here’s how to invest

The gold price has soared in recent days, and it could go higher yet, says John Stepek. Either way, you should hold some gold in your portfolio.

In September 2011, gold hit an all-time high in US dollars of $1,923.70 an ounce. That was an intraday high (ie, it happened during the session). The closing high was a bit lower, set in August 2011 at $1,891.90. 

Both of those highs have now been beaten. Gold ended the day on Friday at $1,897.50, a new closing high, while this morning it rose to a new intraday high of $1,944.39. 

It’s only taken nine years. Good things come to those who wait, it seems. 

Of course, you could argue that these numbers are not as significant as they might seem. As John Authors points out in his Bloomberg newsletter this morning, once you take inflation into account, gold is still below the 2011 US dollar high. That in itself was also below the 1980 high, which saw gold spike to $850-odds.

Also, gold has been setting new all-time highs in pretty much every other global currency for a while now. For example, gold’s 2011 high in pounds was around £1,180. Today, it’s around £1,500.  

Lest you think this is purely Brexit-related, it’s the same story for the euro. A record high in 2012 (just after European Central Bank boss Mario Draghi drew a line under the eurozone crisis with his “whatever it takes” speech) of around €1,380 has given way to fresh highs above €1,600. 

So, yes, gold still has a way to go to hit an inflation-adjusted dollar high. And yes, it’s a very dollar-centric way to look at things, given that gold has been hitting new records in every other currency for ages. 

But the US dollar is the most important currency in the world. And the fact that gold has now hit a genuinely new high in said currency, means that it’ll draw a lot more attention than all the other new highs did. 

What’s next for gold? 

So, what now? In the short term, as with any asset, it’s anyone’s guess. You shouldn’t be worrying about the short term, because you’re not a day trader. 

(But in case you are, be aware that the Federal Reserve is holding its latest meeting on monetary policy this week, with the outcome announced on Wednesday evening our time – so there’s the potential for volatility, setbacks, etc around that.)

In the longer term, we like gold for two reasons. 

One, we see it as portfolio insurance. It’s something you should always have in your portfolio – along with bonds, equities (and property), plus cash  – simply because it does something that no other asset class does. 

Gold doesn’t rely on any other counterparty for its value. If you own equity, the underlying company can go bust. If you own a bond, the underlying company or government can go bust. And if own cash, the underlying government can go bust. 

Gold is just an inert, relatively rare metal that human beings happen to place a value on. So it has “intrinsic" value. 

That value goes up and down depending on what’s happening in the world. But it’s highly unlikely to go to zero until we can produce it out of thin air, in which case we’ll have solved the scarcity problem and we won’t need money anymore in any case.   

That’s what makes gold unique. That’s what gives it its diversifying properties. And that’s why we reckon you should pretty much always own at least a bit of gold, regardless of the backdrop, or whether the outlook is bullish or bearish for the yellow metal. This is the reason why we’ve always told you to own it. 

Conditions are ripe for further gains

However, currently we also like gold for a second reason – because the conditions are ripe for gold to continue to go higher. And while it’s now hit a record high (and so might take a breather, or might not), we still think there’s room for it to go higher.

I explained the key reason why in the most recent issue of MoneyWeek magazine (you can get your first six issues free here if you don’t already subscribe). But to cut a long story short, if inflation goes up and interest rates stay where they are, that’s good news for gold.  

Obviously gold has come a long way. But the levels of exuberance (magazine covers, mainstream news appearances) that we saw in 2011 aren’t apparent yet. 

That’s partly because gold’s got plenty of competition from the likes of tech stocks and Tesla to keep investors occupied. But it’s also because this has been a particularly stealthy and quick bull market. 

I mean, it was only a few months ago that market pundits were pointing at gold’s slide during the early days of the coronavirus crash and joking about its “safe haven” qualities, having failed to understand that in a crash, the quality stuff (blue chips, Treasuries, precious metal) gets sold off to fund margin calls on all the dodgy stuff.  

So, while I expect gold to get a few headlines now, and while we’ve seen the occasional big number target ($3,000 from Bank of America a few months ago), I don’t think we’re at the peak yet. 

So, if you don’t own gold, it’s worth holding some. You can invest via bullion dealers (either get the gold and stick it in a safe, or pay them to store it for you). Or you can use an exchange-traded fund (ETF) – go for the physical-backed ones. 

If you own gold, but you are interested in placing a bet on prices rising further, then there are other options to consider. 

Silver has rocketed even faster than gold. It’s a brutally volatile, contrary, vicious metal (Dominic has written of his painful history with silver here), but if you have the stomach for it, then you could look into the silver ETF. Just bear in mind that silver really does swing about a lot – the last time it hit its peak of nearly $50 an ounce in April 2011, it practically halved in value the following month.  

Another potential catch-up play is the precious metals miners. These have come a long way since their coronavirus March lows (the junior miners ETF has more than doubled, for example). However, if gold stays at these levels or goes higher, then they should be able to rise a good deal further. 

Last time gold was at these levels, the miners were spraying cash around the room like they had their own personal central bank printing presses. These days there’s less exuberance, as Dominic recently pointed out. 

Which miners? We’ve discussed some individual ideas in MoneyWeek magazine (another good reason to subscribe), but if you’re not a stock picker – and bear in mind that even a mining index is risky let alone buying individual miners – then sticking with a tracker or a gold mining fund is your best bet.

The implications of a soaring gold price are not necessarily happy news for most other assets. But we’ll discuss that another day. This is why we diversify, after all.  


Don’t panic about Iran – but don’t sell your gold either

Don’t panic about Iran – but don’t sell your gold either

Markets have reacted calmly to the tension between the US and Iran. But don’t get too complacent. It’s still a good idea to hold on to some gold as in…
9 Jan 2020
Here’s how gold could rise above $7,000 an ounce

Here’s how gold could rise above $7,000 an ounce

That the gold price could hit $7,000 an ounce is a logical and plausible possibility, says Charlie Morris. Here, he explains how it could get there.
30 Dec 2019
Gold is in a bull market – and it could have much further to go

Gold is in a bull market – and it could have much further to go

Many investors forget that gold is still the best-performing asset of this century, says Charlie Morris. It could also have much further to go.
27 Dec 2019
All the gold in China: money and power goes east

All the gold in China: money and power goes east

China has far more gold than official figures suggest – as much as America, in fact. He who owns the gold makes the rules, says Dominic Frisby.
15 Nov 2019

Most Popular

The Bank of England should create a "Bitpound" digital currency and take the world by storm

The Bank of England should create a "Bitpound" digital currency and take the world by storm

The Bank of England could win the race to create a respectable digital currency if it moves quickly, says Matthew Lynn.
18 Oct 2020
What would negative interest rates mean for your money?
UK Economy

What would negative interest rates mean for your money?

There has been much talk of the Bank of England introducing negative interest rates. John Stepek explains why they might do that, and what it would me…
15 Oct 2020
Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts
Bank accounts

Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts

Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK bankin…
19 Oct 2020