It looks increasingly likely that the age of oil is on the way out. We’ve been through previous cycles of optimism about other energy sources that didn’t change much: there was plenty of talk about government-backed growth plans involving massive renewables investment after the 2008 crisis, but considerably less action. While there has been increased investment and technological advances that have made renewables cheaper, the world still runs on fossil fuels.
However, it feels different this time. Climate concerns and geopolitical issues have created
a vast incentive for countries such as the US to invest in energy infrastructure (see right). The latest forecasts from the International Energy Agency (IEA), published last week, are clearly in line with that scenario.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
The IEA thinks that demand growth will slow sharply in the next few years as electric vehicles replace ones that run on fossil fuel. Demand will rise by 2.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) this year, but by 2028 the annual increase will be just 0.4 mb/d. We’ll still use plenty of oil, but it will be petrochemical demand (and to some extent aviation, the hardest transport use to replace) that drives demand growth. Thus the IEA expects total demand of 105.7 mb/d in 2028 and still rising, but combustible fossil-fuel demand to hit a absolute peak of 81.6 mb/d in the same year.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
The IEA’s forecasts have had “a questionable history” as Bloomberg puts it – ie, they are very often very wrong. Still, this outlook seems pretty plausible. It’s hard to see what would drive a much faster growth in fossil fuels in a world in which many major economies see the energy transition as a way to drive economic growth. The IEA estimates that more than $2trn is already lined up for clean-energy investment by 2030.
It’s harder to say what this means for oil prices. In the short term, demand doesn’t look especially bullish. Oil demand growth tracks global GDP growth, deflated by about 1.6 percentage points due to efficiency gains, argues Daval Joshi of BCA Research in a recent note. He thinks economic growth and oil forecasts are still too optimistic, and reckons crude could drop to $55.
On the supply side, the IEA is forecasting tight markets next year, on the basis that Chinese demand will rise and Opec will cut demand. That may be unduly bullish: more supplies from sanctioned countries (Iran, Russia and Venezuela) are making their way into markets, and Saudi Arabia’s unilateral cut this month showed that it is struggling to get its Opec peers to join in.
Still, weak prices discourage more investment: US active oil and gas rig have dropped sharply in recent weeks. Ultimately, around $70 may be the sweet spot – generating enough cash without encouraging firms to spend it. The worst scenario for investors would be for Big Oil to ramp up output in the face of the shift the IEA predicts.
