Judicial elections: will Mexico’s bold political experiment come at a cost?

Mexico's historic judicial elections attracted little attention, but the implications could be far-reaching

President of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, shows her finger after casting her vote at a polling station for the country's first judicial elections
(Image credit: Mariana Maytorena/ObturadorMX/Getty Images)

Mexico is about to become “the first country in the world where every judge on every court is chosen by popular vote”, says The Economist. Judicial elections this month attracted little attention, with just 13% of voters turning out. Yet the implications could be far-reaching, with the contests overwhelmingly won by candidates with links to Morena, the left-wing ruling party. Supporters argue that reform is needed to root out corrupt judges. Opponents say that politicised judges remove the last meaningful check on the government of president Claudia Sheinbaum, which already commands congressional super-majorities.

What does Sheinbaum's consolidation of power mean for Mexico?

Mexican shares still trade on a reasonable 12.2 times forward 12-month earnings, cheaper than the ten-year historical average of 13.6, say Kelsey Butler and Vinicius Andrade on Bloomberg. Latin American shares have spent the past decade struggling amid weak commodity prices, a strong US dollar and fractious politics, says Dan Lefkovitz for Morningstar. That left the region deeply out of favour, yet perhaps the rush for the exits was a “contrarian indicator”. The Mexican peso is up 9% against the US dollar this year. At a time of global trade uncertainty, investors appreciate the “defensive” nature of Mexican stocks, which boast “strong balance sheets” and are biased towards “steady” segments such as consumer staples.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

For all the trade squalls, Mexico’s proximity to the United States still gives its manufacturers a “near-shoring advantage”, adds Mary Anastasia O’Grady in The Wall Street Journal. But in the long-term, “terminating the independent judiciary” will come at a “high cost”. Foreign capital will be much warier of investing in a country where the legal system acts as a “subsidiary” of the government rather than an impartial enforcer of the law. Without credible contracts and property rights, the path to prosperity becomes much more difficult.


This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

Markets editor

Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019. 

Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere. 

He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful. 

Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.