Why investors should avoid market monomania

US equities markets investors obsession concept

(Image credit: Getty Images)

My hope when markets began to wobble earlier this year was that the spotlight would start to shift a little bit away from US equities. This isn’t because I’m a committed bear on America. Yes, I am uncomfortable with how much a typical global portfolio will now have in pricey-looking US stocks when domestic politics are clearly becoming less business-friendly. However, that is about managing risk rather than a firm certainty that the tech boom has yet run its course.

Instead, my concern is that the amount of commentary that hinges on the US market, US economy and US politics – indeed, anything wrapped in the stars and stripes – has become monomaniacal. Markets have far too little idea what is happening elsewhere. Take the entire UK stock market, which is dying in part because there is so little attention paid to the small- and mid-cap segment that it no longer functions. The number of take-private deals at large premiums to the undisturbed price testifies to that.

MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Investors are noticing emerging markets again

Consider emerging markets. I wrote about this shift relatively recently, but it bears repeating. After ages in the doldrums, they are having a good year: the MSCI Emerging Markets index is up by 16% in sterling terms in the first nine months (developed markets are up 8%, the US is up 6%). Yet that scratches just the surface of the changes: within the EM universe, India – the main bright spot of the past decade – is off 8%, while China has rebounded 29%. Korea is up 44%. Emerging Europe and Latin America are all doing very well. One cannot argue that there have been major economic or political shifts in most of these countries to change the case for them. The conclusion is that many are simply being noticed once more as flows into the US slow down.

The wider point here is not about emerging markets, but about the merits of keeping some of your portfolio in assets that are sensibly valued even when they are lagging. As private investors, we don’t need to worry about measuring our performance against a benchmark. Our goal is not to wager everything on the top-performing stocks and collect a performance fee. We aim to maximise our odds of earning a solid return and minimise our risks of devastating losses. Paying attention to out-of-favour assets is part of this.

As a final note, the MoneyWeek Wealth Summit – our annual event and MoneyWeek’s 25th birthday – on 7 November in London will run along these lines. Yes, it’s called Turmoil, tariffs and Trump 2.0. Yes, we have a session on AI. But our speakers will be looking at growth, value and wealth-preservation opportunities to suit a world that is mostly not America.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

Explore More

Cris Sholt Heaton is the contributing editor for MoneyWeek.

He is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is experienced in covering international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers.

He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.