Trump’s EU deal will help blue-collar workers.” So believes Nicole Russell, a columnist for USA Today, “Critics can hate Trump’s personality all they want,” she says, “but the president’s ability to forge trade deals that favour American workers shouldn’t be discounted.” The gist of Russell’s argument is that the deal includes requirements for Europe to buy energy and military equipment from the US. This kind of stuff is made by people wearing hard hats or wielding power tools – that is, by “blue collar” workers.
Russell must not have much free time. If she had, she might have thought this through a bit further. In the first place, why should US government policy favour one group of workers (blue collar) over another group (white collar)? In the second place, the tariffic negotiations also favour very big businesses – oil and defence. How is that a plus for the guys who mostly work for small businesses?
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
In the fourth place, who does she think pays for the tariffs? Tariffs are essentially a tax, paid by American importers – and then passed along to US consumers. White collar, blue collar or no collar at all – they’re all going to pay. Who else would? Dogs don’t pay tariffs. Inanimate objects don’t. In the end, all government revenues must come from the people.
Has Trump "achieved the remarkable"?
None of it makes sense. The US is running a $2 trillion deficit and heading for a financial crisis. But the trade deals are seen as a political “win” for Trump.
Trump has, says The Wall Street Journal, “achieved the remarkable: raising tariffs by more than the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, while – it appears – avoiding the destructive trade war that followed”. Including the deal struck with the EU, the US will impose an effective tariff rate of about 15% on its trading partners, by far the highest since the 1930s, according to JPMorgan Chase.
But will the deals stick? Trump’s big trade deal with Japan is already falling apart, says The New Republic. A report from the Financial Times shows that US and Japanese officials aren’t seeing eye-to-eye on what exactly was agreed. Mireya Solís of the Brookings Institution told the FT “both sides made promises we can’t be sure will be kept” and “there are no guarantees on what the actual level of investments from Japan will be”. It’s not exactly a done deal with Europe either. Fred Hutchison, CEO of LNG export group LNG Allies, told Energy Intel that both sides can do a lot to encourage additional commercial deals in the LNG sector, but “neither government has any control over what happens commercially”.
Trump got his deals thanks to leverage over other countries’ deep economic and security ties to the US, says the WSJ. But in the coming years, “that leverage will wane as those countries cultivate markets elsewhere and build up their own militaries. The resulting international system will be less dependent on the US – and less stable.”
The markets are less stable too. Already teetering at the tippy-top of their trading range, stocks have become even more overvalued. More importantly, Trump has raised the cost of trading with the US. He must also have increased the desire not to trade with it at all.
For more from Bill, see bonnerprivateresearch.com
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Equity release jumps 4% amid growing inheritance tax concerns and sticky inflationThe amount of money withdrawn by equity release has increased, but the total number of plans has fallen
-
Nest Pensions abandoned by 10 million workers – why are savers ditching the UK’s biggest workplace pension?Savers are halting contributions and leaving millions of small pots behind them, Freedom of Information (FOI) data provided exclusively to MoneyWeek shows. We look at why and what it means.
-
LVMH is set to prosper as the wealthy start shopping againAfter two years of uncertainty, the outlook for LVMH is starting to improve. Is now a good time to add the luxury-goods purveyor to your portfolio?
-
Investors need to get ready for an age of uncertainty and upheavalTectonic geopolitical and economic shifts are underway. Investors need to consider a range of tools when positioning portfolios to accommodate these changes
-
AI is a bet we’re forced to makeIt’s impossible to say yet if AI will revolutionise the world, but failure would clearly be very costly, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Lessons from Nobel Prize winners in economics on how to nurture a culture of growthThe Nobel Prize in economics went to three thinkers who show us why economies grow and how we can help them do so. Governments would be wise to heed the lessons
-
How much gold does China have – and how to cash inChina's gold reserves are vastly understated, says Dominic Frisby. So hold gold, overbought or not
-
Debasing Wall Street's new debasement trade ideaThe debasement trade is a catchy and plausible idea, but there’s no sign that markets are alarmed, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Europe’s new single stock market is no panaceaOpinion It is hard to see how a single European stock exchange will fix anything. Friedrich Merz is trying his hand at a failed strategy, says Matthew Lynn
-
Who is Rob Granieri, the mysterious billionaire leader of Jane Street?Profits at Jane Street have exploded, throwing billionaire Rob Granieri into the limelight. But it’s not just the firm’s success that is prompting scrutiny
