The massive leak of files from Uber last week has blown open the minicab giant’s lobbying machine. European commissioners were rushing from meeting to meeting with lobbyists; politicians were dazzled with campaign donations, jobs for families and friends, and the promise of lucrative consultancy contracts.
Meanwhile, Uber’s staff openly boasted about how the company was built on law-breaking, tearing up labour laws and suppressing dissent; drivers were encouraged to get into fights with their opponents because violence works; managers were instructed to hit the “kill switch” to delete data whenever regulators or police threatened to seize it.
Overall, the picture is of a firm rising to dominance using methods that the Corleone family in The Godfather might have found a little on the pushy side. Yet while nobody would deny that Uber went over the top, we shouldn’t lose sight of the real scandal here: the fact that the companies were not able to make their case in the open.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
We should recall that Uber was taking on and challenging one of the most restrictive industries in the world. Before it arrived on the scene, it was virtually impossible to get a taxi in Paris (a report in 2000 found the city had fewer taxis than in 1920). In London, the black cabbies kept an iron grip on the trade, charging sky-high prices, while anyone hoping to get back to zone five after midnight could expect to be advised to find an alternative method of transport (except in more colourful language). And in New York, cab licences were so tightly controlled that they changed hands for tens of thousands of dollars.
Uber’s super-slick app broke cartels in major cities around the world, providing lots of flexible, well-paid work to drivers (mostly recent immigrants, as it happens), and lots more choice to consumers. In London, a service that had become largely restricted to executives on expense accounts was suddenly opened up to teenagers getting home from a club in the middle of the night.
Make the case for freedom
Uber’s mistake was that it chose to stay in the shadows while trying to change this. It should not have been Emmanuel Macon, then still France’s finance minister, that it was lobbying to help re-write the country’s taxi regulations (or London mayor Sadiq Khan in the UK), but ordinary voters. Because it failed to do so, it ended up being heavily regulated anyway.
Drivers now have to be offered holiday pay and a range of other benefits. The result is that prices have gone up, the availability of cars is down, and the company’s share price has collapsed, falling by 50% so far this year alone.
We can see the same fate befalling other tech giants. The UK government is clamping down hard on Airbnb rentals, with the result that hotels are now often cheaper than borrowing someone’s flat. The social-media players are collaborating with the government’s online harm bill, turning themselves into petty censors. Amazon stays meekly silent as its marketplaces that open up industries to micro-entrepreneurs are regulated out of existence. Google is too timid to explain how search and maps increase choice instead of restricting it.
Yet giant tech companies should be standing up for free markets and free speech. Uber had a perfectly respectable case about how it was benefiting consumers. So do Airbnb, Amazon, Tesla and many others. The lesson from the Uber leaks is surely that backdoor lobbying doesn’t work. Only making a robust case for freedom and choice is effective in the long run.
-
Renewable investing: who is paying for the green revolution?Investors in renewables have not been rewarded, says Bruce Packard. Will they fund the government’s plans?
-
UK house prices rose 4.6% last year – where did property prices grow most?House prices increased by 4.6% in 2024, giving an average property price of £268,000. Where did property prices grow the most and will they continue to rise this year?
-
Trapped in a time of zombie governmentIt’s not just companies that are eking out an existence, says Max King. The state is in the twilight zone too.
-
America is in deep denial over debtThe downgrade in America’s credit rating was much criticised by the US government, says Alex Rankine. But was it a long time coming?
-
Bank of England raises interest rates to 5.25%The Bank has hiked rates from 5% to 5.25%, marking the 14th increase in a row. We explain what it means for savers and homeowners - and whether more rate rises are on the horizon
-
UK inflation remains at 8.7% ‒ what it means for your moneyInflation was unmoved at 8.7% in the 12 months to May. What does this ‘sticky’ rate of inflation mean for your money?
-
VICE bankruptcy: how did it happen?Was the VICE bankruptcy inevitable? We look into how the once multibillion-dollar came crashing down.
-
Would a food price cap actually work?Analysis The government is discussing plans to cap the prices of essentials. But could this intervention do more harm than good?
-
UK inflation slides to 8.7% - what does it mean for your money?News Inflation has dropped below 10% for the first time in months, but with food prices at a 45-year high, is this good news and what does it mean for your money?
-
Why the UK equity market is shrinkingAnalysis The crisis has been building for 25 years, says Max King, and it will take decades to reverse the trend.
