Features

Chart of the week: so much for “stocks for the long term”

The average holding period for US stocks plunged from 30 years just before the Second World War to less than two by 2012.

Chart of the average holding period for US stocks

Whatever happened to the notion of "stocks for the long term"?

Far too many investors make the mistake of trying to time the market, says Mark Atherton in The Times, which means they jump in and out so frequently that dealing costs (and the missed opportunities they forfeit by being impatient) erode their returns. Professional investors do this too.

The upshot is that the average holding period for US stocks plunged from 30 years just before the Second World War to less than two by 2012, according to America's Ned Davis Research.

It's high time we all adhered to Warren Buffett's maxim that you shouldn't buy a stock unless you wouldn't mind if the market closed for a decade and you couldn't sell it.

Viewpoint

Philip Aldrick, The Times

Most Popular

Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts
Bank accounts

Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accounts

Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK bankin…
19 Oct 2020
Why commodities could be the best investment for 2021
Commodities

Why commodities could be the best investment for 2021

There’s plenty for investors to worry about right now. But things will inevitably recover. And the sector most likely to do best when they do, says Jo…
22 Oct 2020
UK post-Covid recovery stocks: these 20 companies could be set to rocket
Share tips

UK post-Covid recovery stocks: these 20 companies could be set to rocket

Finding stocks with the potential to rise tenfold or even further is far easier said than done. But the pandemic has produced the most promising backd…
22 Oct 2020