Features

Chart of the week: so much for “stocks for the long term”

The average holding period for US stocks plunged from 30 years just before the Second World War to less than two by 2012.

Chart of the average holding period for US stocks

Whatever happened to the notion of "stocks for the long term"?

Far too many investors make the mistake of trying to time the market, says Mark Atherton in The Times, which means they jump in and out so frequently that dealing costs (and the missed opportunities they forfeit by being impatient) erode their returns. Professional investors do this too.

The upshot is that the average holding period for US stocks plunged from 30 years just before the Second World War to less than two by 2012, according to America's Ned Davis Research.

It's high time we all adhered to Warren Buffett's maxim that you shouldn't buy a stock unless you wouldn't mind if the market closed for a decade and you couldn't sell it.

Viewpoint

Philip Aldrick, The Times

Most Popular

The times may be changing, but don’t change how you invest
Small cap stocks

The times may be changing, but don’t change how you invest

We are living in strange times. But the basics of investing remain the same: buy fairly-priced stocks that can provide an income. And there are few be…
13 Sep 2021
Two shipping funds to buy for steady income
Investment trusts

Two shipping funds to buy for steady income

Returns from owning ships are volatile, but these two investment trusts are trying to make the sector less risky.
7 Sep 2021
Should investors be worried about stagflation?
US Economy

Should investors be worried about stagflation?

The latest US employment data has raised the ugly spectre of “stagflation” – weak growth and high inflation. John Stepek looks at what’s going on and …
6 Sep 2021