If the huge deficits in the UK's defined-benefit (DB) pension schemes have kept you awake at night in recent years, I have some good news. The overall deficit appears to be falling very fast. In August 2016, according to the Pension Protection Fund's 7800 index (which covers most DB funds in the UK), pension funds were short by £459bn. In February 2017, it was £196bn. This February? A mere £71bn.
How did this happen? It isn't what you think. It's true that longevity in the UK is levelling off (for now), and that companies have been holding off on investment and wage rises in favour of topping up pension funds. But the real difference is UK gilt yields. As the PPF 7800 monthly reports make clear, pension "liabilities are sensitive to the yields available on a range of conventional and index-linked gilts". Thanks to silly assumptions and actuarial fiddles, when yields fall, deficits rise. When yields rise, deficits fall. It is that simple.
In August 2016, after the Bank of England's ill-advised interest-rate cut, 15-year gilt yields fell to 0.90%. Today they are 1.67%. That has made all the difference. This suggestion that the pension problem is in large part illusory might make you lose interest in the deficits. Even if it doesn't, you can at least stop worrying: a couple more interest-rate rises and the deficit problem could just vanish.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
In the meantime, there are many things pension fund managers could do to help things along. They might look to Japan, where the $1.4trn Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) has declared that it has had it with the fund-management industry. It is fed up with them getting paid the same percentage fee on their assets, regardless of whether they beat the market or not; fed up with them focusing more on gathering assets (on which to be paid fees) than taking the risks required to do well (and justify those fees); and fed up with the "lack of alignment of interest" between the GPIF and its managers. So it now intends to pay active managers the equivalent of passive fees (very little), unless they outperform, in which case they will get more.
Big managers will hate this: their business plans rely on being able to overcharge and underperform over the long run. But for the rest of us, it's very exciting. First, because we can (I hope) look forward to our own pension providers taking the same stand on our behalf; second, because it will then boost pension-fund returns (the less you pay the industry, the more you get); and third, because we now get the fun of seeing if managers on the GPIF payroll can outperform and of seeing what happens to their margins if they do not. We'll offer them a few pointers. Maybe cool it with the FANGs; think about valuations in general; and perhaps look at UK firms whose share prices have been hit hard by large-looking pension deficits. They'll start to look cheap when rates rise again.
-
Christmas at Chatsworth: review of The Cavendish Hotel at BaslowMoneyWeek Travel Matthew Partridge gets into the festive spirit at The Cavendish Hotel at Baslow and the Christmas market at Chatsworth
-
Tycoon Truong My Lan on death row over world’s biggest bank fraudProperty tycoon Truong My Lan has been found guilty of a corruption scandal that dwarfs Malaysia’s 1MDB fraud and Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto scam
-
The myth of hypothecated taxesEditor's letter The government wants to add a penny on our National Insurance contributions to pay for social care. But it won’t, says Merryn Somerset Webb. It will just vanish into the black hole of our public finances.
-
Should capital gains tax be higher or lower?Editor's letter Capital gains tax is up for review. There are plenty of long-term arguments to be had about this. But in the short term, Merryn Somerset Webb has a few ideas for the government should it want a little cash inflow.
-
The best thing you can do for your children is to secure your own financesEditor's letter The "Bank of Mum and Dad" is now the 11th-largest mortgage lender in the UK. But giving your children money may not be the best way to help them, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Inheritance tax: just abolish the entire thingEditor's letter Why not abolish inheritance tax and replace it with a gift tax on the recipients of unearned cash – wherever it comes from?
-
Save into your pension while you canEditor's letter Fiddling with pension tax relief could be a nice little earner for a government hungry for cash, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Save what you can while you can.
-
Don't get too relaxed about your pensionEditor's letter George Osborne might leave pensions alone for now, says Merryn Somerset Webb. But don't count on it staying that way.
-
Pensions: the counter-revolution
Editor's letter An awful lot of people are beginning to wish Geogre Osborne had never started down the path of pensions reform, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Three pension traps for the unwary
Editor's letter Pensions Freedom Day is almost upon us and you're right to be excited, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Just watch out for these three pitfalls.
