Windfall taxes, and why windfarm owners should start worrying

Windfall taxes are back in the news. The only surprise is that it took this long. After all, governments in financial trouble have only two real choices: they can dramatically cut public spending; or they can have a good look to see who has cash and they can help themselves to it.

I’ve said here several times that it makes sense to be cautious when investing in ‘defensive’ companies for the simple reason that the thing that makes them attractive to you – cash and cashflow – makes them attractive to the government. That was a point nicely proven by Sir John Major’s call for a windfall tax on utility company profits this week.

Downing Street called the ex-PM’s comments “interesting”. You can also bet they’ll be keeping a close eye on the reaction to the idea.

But the utility companies aren’t the only ones who should be shifting around nervously. Landowners in Scotland who are rolling around in wind turbine cash might want to start worrying too. Why? Because the redistribution of wealth from the rest of us to them via energy company bills really irritates a lot of people.

At the same time, a largish percentage of Scottish nationalists are firm believers in developing a high-tax, big-state nation (despite the fact that to an outsider’s eye they already appear to live in one).  So much so, that they demanded a debate on whether all on- and offshore renewable schemes should be legally obliged to hand a 51% shareholding to the state.

That might be a little extreme even for the SNP, but nonetheless the Scottish government review of land ownership has made it pretty clear that they will be looking for ways to “redistribute the cash wealthy lairds make from wind farms* to benefit the less-advantaged”. Hello windfall tax.

This is all a bit circular, of course (taxing subsidies…). But that’s modern policy for you.

*This is serious cash by the way. I’ve written on it here before, but the Mail on Sunday also enjoys a good rant on the issue. Their latest suggests that the Earl of Glasgow is set to make over £5m from his turbines, while the Earl of Moray will be getting over £7m. Nice work, etc.

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+


2 Responses

  1. 03/11/2013, Carduelis wrote

    There have been more than 2,600 wind farm applications in Scotland over the past 18 months and the SNP has continued to approve wind farms that have not yet received licences from the industry regulator, itself declared illegal. I wonder why the SNP is so keen to build up the sector?
    Is it, perhaps, that they expect taxpayers and consumers south of the border to continue to pay the wind farm subsidies post independence?

  2. 08/11/2013, chapter24 wrote

    Because it’s the cheapest way to generate electricity that does not release carbon pollution.

    In future new nuclear designs may end up cheaper, but as the SNP has set its face against nuclear onshore wind is currently the best option.

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Heading higher?

Or are house prices set to fall?

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

'Would you rather upset God, or have Him just ignore you?'

In the first of three interviews with Merryn Somerset Webb, Hugh Hendry, manager of the Eclectica Fund, talks about what it takes to be a good hedge fund manager – and how he learned to stop worrying and love central banks.


Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.


21 November 1969: The first permanent Arpanet link

A milestone in the formation of the internet, the first permanent Arpanet link was established on this day in 1969 between researchers in the United States.