Luxury-goods firms feel the heat

I’ve written here several times about the rising risks in holding luxury-good-company stocks. A few titbits in the newspapers over the weekend make the case for selling out ever more clear.

First, a small story in the Guardian. It notes the case of state official Yang Dacai and his watch collection – which I tweeted about last week. Yang was shown in pictures online wearing, on several different occasions, a variety of different ludicrously expensive watches, none of which he should have been able to afford on his official salary. He is now being investigated by the party’s provincial discipline inspection committee (which doesn’t sound that nice).

Yang’s troubles aren’t a one off. There is also uproar over a Ferrari crash back in March in which it is rumoured that the son of one of President Hu Jintao’s allies died. Gatherings of top politicians are now routinely picked apart by bloggers for evidence of the kind of designer gear no one living on a state salary alone could afford.

The result? The government, says the Guardian, “has ordered officials to eschew luxury cars and expensive banquets”. So, not only is it no longer a great idea to advertise your tendency to corruption and nepotism via your watches, suits and cars (see my blog “Look at me, I’m a thieving enemy of the people”), but the government has told you to give it a rest as well. I can’t see how that can be good news for all the luxury goods companies relying on China for their growth.

And it isn’t just in China where the likes of Ferrari need to have their wits about them. The Sunday Times Ingear section this week had a small piece on supercars and VAT. Regular readers will know that ownership levies on high-performance cars in Italy recently quadrupled – it now costs around £6,500 a year in taxes to own a Lamborghini. They might not know that this has given the Lib Dems ideas.

Their policymakers, in their odd breaks from planning unworkable wealth taxes, are apparently “drawing up plans for a higher rate of VAT on expensive vehicles which could add at least £8,000 to a new Ferrari or Lamborghini”. It used to make sense to hold luxury goods on the basis that lots of people were getting richer and that rich people like to overpay for luxury goods. Neither of those things are as true as they were.

2 Responses

  1. 11/09/2012, Merryn wrote

    Burberry announces profits to be hit in part by slow down in gift giving in China.. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9534820/Burberry-cuts-profit-forecast-after-flat-sales.html

  2. 11/09/2012, flyfly wrote

    You guys get a lot of stick when your picks go down but not a lot of love when you get things right, so nice job on the lean away from Burberry and similar recently. People who invested 2+ years ago are still nicely up, a classic case I imagine of the professionals getting in and staying ahead but private players following the hot money and losing out.

Commenting on this article closed

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Paying by mobile

Why your phone will replace your wallet

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.