Later today, it is the turn of the US Federal Reserve to announce its intentions regarding the Fed funds interest rate (and possibly more quantitative easing later?). This should affect EUR/USD.
I have a question for you. If you were handed in advance the text of what Mario Draghi or Janet Yellen were about to say in their monthly reports, regarding their plans on changes in interest rates and money-printing (as many are, I believe), which way would you trade ahead of the reports?
Goodness knows, so many pundits obsess about these events before the event and then pore over the entrails afterwards. You would think that they contain the key to unlock riches beyond compare.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
This has to be the supreme test of the near-universal theory that the news (and economic data) makes the markets. Surely, only a rabid contrarian could believe that increasing the supply of a currency could strengthen it. Or lowering interest rates into even deeper negative territory would also strengthen it.
And if it turns out that you have guessed incorrectly, would you abandon that theory?
Well get ready to do just that. This is the EUR/USD performance after the December European Central Bank (ECB) announcement where Draghi shocked the markets by not only going negative on rates for the first time, but also kicking off a mammoth bond-buying spree. I call this his Big Bazooka Mark 1:
Ouch! It seems that he aimed his bazooka on his own army in a display of friendly fire! That was an eight cent appreciation on D-Day 1 in the "wrong" direction.
And here is last week's carbon copy performance when he ramped up the money printing and went even more negative on rates:
This time, the collateral damage was worth four cents to the enemy from that wrong-way Bazooka Mark 2. And the economic damage, under conventional thinking, is to future exports from the EU, which is the opposite of stated intentions. Another example of unintended consequences from one of the omnipotent central bank coterie!
Twice, the conventional and entirely rational conclusion must be that having prior knowledge of the ECB's intentions in December and this month caused a "sensible" trader to lose money.
Of course, this perverse behaviour can be rationalised by invoking the "sell the rumour, buy the news" principle (STRBTN), as I did. But that has nothing to do with the "news makes the markets" theory. It is only in hindsight that you can label the move as a STRBTN. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
The rational conclusion must be that by correctly placing the horse before the cart, it is the news that makes the market. And that means that most of the material a typical investor reads is misleading (or worse), especially when it appears in the mainstream media.
But I still read it! It is in the understanding that in the interests of research, I am attempting to judge market sentiment. And sentiment was bearish the euro going into both D-Days, making the market vulnerable to short covering, no matter what Draghi had said.
These two events are examples of how, by taking a reading on sentiment, you can be in touch with the most likely path of least resistance. When you can do that, you can locate high probability/low risk trades, which are the only type of trade I consider. I must feel I have the odds very much on my side before I commit funds.
That means I rarely "chase" the market after a sharp move. Buying in a rapidly rising market is often hazardous because sharp snap-backs could occur at any time and stop you out.
A great example of this is provided by the above charts. If you were a little late in the day, you might be tempted into going long EUR/USD after the rallies had tipped its hand. But that was the most dangerous time to do that going long on December 3 around the 1.10 area was high risk because the market settled lower after your entry in a normal consolidation.
In general, I like to enter trades as the market is emerging from a congestion zone. Here is my trade entry on D-Day 1 in December:
In anticipation of a possible sharp rally, I had placed my entry buy-stop just above my blue trendline, which was hit as the market exploded upwards. This entry was still inside the congestion zone the market had formed since November.
The point is that in these zones, there are many "wrong" way short bets that must be unwound as the rally gets under way. This acts like a line of dominos falling over and at no time is a long trade at risk. That is the ideal swing trade entry.
Today, we shall learn what the Fed will (or won't) be intending. Is there a currency trade here?
-
Pension warning: one in five don’t know how much is going into their pensionHow to check your pension contributions and why it matters
-
50,000 power of attorney applications rejected – how to avoid common mistakesA freedom of information request shows that thousands of lasting power of attorney (LPA) applications are rejected due to errors. We explain how to avoid mistakes and reveal tips to make the process as straightforward as possible
