Coronavirus crisis hits occupational pension schemes

Members of generous final-salary workplace pension schemes could see their guaranteed benefits jeopardised by the Covid-19 pandemic. Many such schemes are in deficit: they lack the money to make good on all the pension promises made to employees .

In the short term, the outlook has improved. The Pensions Regulator has now given employers longer to make up this shortfall since many firms are suffering from the pandemic.

This will help employers squeezed by the virus. But it will mean that pension schemes operate with larger holes in their finances for longer. And if the business fails to recover, it may leave the pension scheme short of the funds it needs to pay pensions, both to those already retired and to future pensioners.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

A regulatory gamble

In such circumstances, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), the industry lifeboat scheme, would typically step in to pay pensions, but only up to a certain level. The PPF has maximum cash limits on the payouts it makes and also requires those yet to retire to accept a 10% reduction in their pensions.

The Pensions Regulator is therefore taking a finely judged gamble. By giving employers longer to reduce final salary pension scheme deficits, it hopes to ease the pressure on their finances, helping them to survive the Covid-19 crisis.

However, where businesses do not make it, their pension financing problems may become more pronounced, resulting in bigger benefit reductions for members not fully covered by the PPF.

The position will also be complicated by the nature of each pension scheme’s investments. Final-salary pension funds with substantial exposure to the stockmarket have seen the value of their investments fall sharply in recent weeks.

Another problem is that historically low gilt yields, which have fallen yet again, reduce the interest rate used to calculate long-term returns on a scheme’s assets. Those in schemes run by private-sector employers hit by the pandemic will need to follow updates from their schemes’ trustees carefully, particularly where their schemes are in deficit.

Meanwhile, members of defined-contribution workplace pension schemes also need to keep a close eye on their situation. For employers struggling with Covid-19, reducing the contributions they make to such schemes on behalf of staff may be a tempting source of savings – and the rules usually allow them to do so. Crucially, while the law requires employers to pay at least 3% of staff salaries into their pension scheme, many choose to make larger contributions.

Will employers pay less?

Now, however, some will seek to save money by reducing their contributions to the 3% minimum. They must give 60 days’ notice of such changes, but will generally be within their rights to cut their payments.

Moreover, for employers taking advantage of the government’s furloughing scheme, the Pensions Regulator is waiving the 60-day notice period altogether. Employers furloughing staff can claim the 3% minimum pension contribution from the government as part of the scheme, but will not be required to make any additional contribution to employees’ pensions.

The upshot is that many members of defined-contribution workplace pension schemes will have less money flowing into their savings plans. Since the benefits from such schemes are not guaranteed – unlike in a final-salary plan – this will mean a reduced pension on retirement. If you’re in a position to do so, it may make sense to increase your own pension contributions for a period to make good the shortfall.