Why the state pension should be means tested

The state pension should only be offered to those who need it, says Merryn Somerset Webb.

170401-pension b

We should only pay state pensions to those who need it

The Cridland report produced last week ended up rather lost in the news about the attack at Westminster and the looming delivery of Theresa May's letter to the EU. But it is worth going back to it for a quick look.

It recommends the state retirement age being pushed from 67 to 68 by 2039 (current plans are 67 by 2028). It also suggests that the triple lock should go after this parliament, and that those who want to work past state retirement age should still be able to defer taking their state pension. All this seems reasonable given rising longevity and the huge cost of our state pension system.

One of the things it also considered and, to some complaint, has now rejected was the idea that there should be some flexibility in the state pension age; that those who are sick or disabled should be able to start getting it early.

This, the argument goes, would mean that the state pension would be able to make some allowance for the varying life expectancies across the country. After all, if life expectancy is six years higher for those in the lowest socio-economic group than it is for those in the highest (this gap is at least narrowing, by the way) surely for everyone to get a fair crack at pension payments those in the lowest should be able to start getting payments earlier.

It's also true that the later you make the state pension age, the more likely it is that those in poor health will find there is a gap between when they stop working and when they get a pension income.

Former pensions minister Ros Altmann is all for it: "Because National Insurance is such a significant part of salary", she says, "it seems inequitable to lock out those people who we know have shorter life expectancy by continually raising the state pension access age." John Cridland doesn't seem to disagree with the premise here. But he reckons that attempting to differentiate is just too complicated and should therefore be ruled out. He suggests additional means-tested help for those near retirement age instead.

This makes sense. The key thing to note is that National Insurance is not a kind of personal insurance. If it were, those with lower life expectancies would pay a lower premium thanks to the expectation that they would take less income and this issue of paying in the same as other people and getting less out wouldn't exist.

What NI actually is, is income tax. There is no National Insurance fund, no personal record of premiums paid and benefits received nothing of the sort. Its just part of the huge pile of unhypothecated taxes that we all pay all every day to keep the government show on the road. From that pile comes the state pension, but also all the means tested benefits that we pay to those who need more than the state pension or who aren't working and aren't yet getting it. In these straitened times what's more important?

Look at it like that and there is surely more reason to means test the entire state pension (why pay it to those who don't need it?) than there is to offer non-means tested early payments to the unwell.

Recommended

How much state pension will I get?
State pensions

How much state pension will I get?

The full new state pension is currently £203.85 per week - but what you get will depend on a number of factors. We look at how to work out exactly how…
8 Jun 2023
Pension dashboard delayed until 2026
Pensions

Pension dashboard delayed until 2026

The deadline for pension schemes to connect to an online pension dashboard, allowing savers to see all their retirement pots in one place, has been pu…
8 Jun 2023
74% of women too nervous to invest
Personal finance

74% of women too nervous to invest

Three in four women do not invest and are missing out on building wealth as a result, research shows.
7 Jun 2023
How much will it cost you to retire early?
Pensions

How much will it cost you to retire early?

The pre-state pension income gap means couples may need an extra £136,000 if they want to retire at 60 – can you afford to retire early?
6 Jun 2023

Most Popular

How much will it cost you to retire early?
Pensions

How much will it cost you to retire early?

The pre-state pension income gap means couples may need an extra £136,000 if they want to retire at 60 – can you afford to retire early?
6 Jun 2023
Best debit and credit cards to use while travelling abroad
Personal finance

Best debit and credit cards to use while travelling abroad

If you’re going on holiday or travel abroad regularly, it’s worth knowing what the best card is to avoid hefty fees. We weigh up the charges and any p…
6 Jun 2023
Best easy access savings accounts – June 2023
Savings

Best easy access savings accounts – June 2023

Rising interest rates have boosted the returns on instant-access savings accounts and we're seeing some of the highest rates seen in years. We look at…
8 Jun 2023