Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Why productivity won't recover to pre-crisis levels
Productivity in Britain has fallen dramatically from the levels it hit in 2007/08. And it won't be bouncing back, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
Whether you approve of its particular brand of productivity or not, we said, people who work in the City are, statistically speaking at least, highly productive. In plain GDP terms, one investment banker operating in a good environment is many times as productive as, say, a car plant worker.
At the moment, City activity is, on some measures at least, at a ten-year low. Look at it like that, and it makes sense that productivity is also low we are employing more people, but they are producing less.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
When we wrote this we didn't have any evidence for it it just seemed like a reasonable explanation. So it was good to see City AM's Allister Heath referring to a new paper out from Douglas McWilliams of the CEBR in his editor's letter. You can read the whole paper here: We should not get so worried about the productivity shortfall.
The key point (to me at least) is that "in some sectors, especially financial services, measured productivity in 2007/8 gave a misleadingly high estimate for productivity since it reflected an unsustainable position (often for example including as output profits that subsequently not only had to be written off but had to be offset by huge provisions)."
So a "significant" part of the explanation for the apparent fall in productivity growth is that the fast growth from 1997 to 2007/8 (2.2% a year) was too good to be true. It reflected not real sustainable GDP growth but froth; froth that is now being "squeezed out" as we deleverage and the City normalises.
The good news? Economists can now stop fretting about why productivity is falling McWilliams appears to have nailed it. The bad? We can't expect an automatic "bounce back" to 2008 levels of productivity to make everything ok.
Explore More
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
