Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Forget HS2 - HS3 is a much better idea
There’s no real need for anyone to get to London faster than they already do. But high-speed rail in the north of England would make a lot of sense.
A few months ago I had to travel from Edinburgh to Liverpool for work. It was utterly miserable. That was partly down to the fact that the event I was attending didn't go very well (for me, at least).
But the real problem was getting to and from the event. You can get to any of the major cities in the UK from London with no bother at all. It might take an hour longer than you would like, but the trains go all the time and, they are pretty fast, and crucially they are direct. Not so up north.
Edinburgh to Liverpool Central a mere 175 miles as the crow flies takes around four hours, and involves changing trains. Manchester to Leeds which are about as far apart as London and Reading is an hour. Liverpool to Leeds is two hours. And so on.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
If you live in the north I suspect that you are as bemused as I am by HS2 and the idea that we all need to get to London faster than we already do (four hours from Edinburgh to London seems just fine to me). What we really want is to get to other northern cities without having to get off to wait on cold platforms, clutching our laptops and praying for no delays as we change trains (the last bit to Liverpool from Edinburgh is on a tiny local train).
So I was thrilled to see that someone in government has finally noticed that there is a problem here George Osborne now says that he wants to improve transport links such that a northern hub that can rival the dominance of Greater London can be created. A nine-million person strong super-city encompassing Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield.
An editorial in the FT today rather dismisses the idea. It accepts that the north needs better infrastructure and more growth, but claims that "it is far from clear how high speed rail will contribute to this".
I can see the problems with it short distances limit speed, and straightening lines is expensive. But it is very clear to me how having better trains between northern cities would help (if it actually happens which I doubt).
It would cost a fortune, but it would also make travelling between cities less time-consuming, boring, and cold something that might make us all travel between them more often.
Explore More
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
