CGT plans are a sneaky attempt to introduce a wealth tax
What looks like a higher capital gains tax is really the wealth tax the Lib Dems have been touting for, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
A worrying tit-bit in the FT today. It seems that the Lib Dems would like to see capital gains tax (CGT) rise from its current levels of 28% to the same levels as income tax rates. That would mean higher earners (and lower earners making big capital gains) paying 40% or 45% on any gains made on assets. This might sound perfectly sensible in some ways. After all, the difference between the two rates at the moment creates a trying incentive for people to work to convert income into capital in order to cut their tax bills. But there's a big problem with it. Inflation.
Back in the 1990s, Gordon Brown cut capital gains tax from 40% to 18% and at the same time removed any kind of inflation indexing relief from the equation. There was very little fuss about this at the time for the simple reason that most people felt a low and simple rate was in itself a good thing and that short-term investors and traders would be big winners from the cut. However, CGT at 28% is already a different matter and CGT at 40% would be a very different matter.
I've written about this beforehereandhere,but think about it like this.Imagine that you buy some shares for £20,000. Over the next ten years, inflation averages 8% a year. The value of your shares also rises by 8% a year. After a decade, you can sell them for £43,200 - and £43,200 now has the same purchasing power as £20,000 in 2013. You sell. You get £43,200. In the old days, that would have meant no tax bill you have made no gains above inflation so there is nothing to tax. No more. Today, you would get a capital gains tax bill.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
You've made a capital gain of £23,200 for tax purposes on which you will pay 18% or 28% (mostly the latter, given the way the bands are calculated) over the annual allowance, currently £10,600. You made a good investment choice, but you have just lost purchasing power anyway. How much? In my last column on this, I assumed that the CGT allowance would rise at half the rate of inflation every year (it is likely to be even less). If that was the case, you would end up with £38,016 after tax. Because CGT is no longer indexed, you have paid tax on that inflation.
The point? Non-indexed capital gains tax effectively confiscates purchasing power from those selling assets. At 18% that was sort of almost OK. But at 40%? It's a very transparent attempt by the Lib Dems to sneak in the wealth tax they really want.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
‘Sandwich generation’ carers losing £6,000 a year to support elderly relativesMiddle-aged adults are often caught between caring for children or grandchildren and their elderly parents, leaving them taking time out of the workforce and facing a huge hit to wages while they are still trying to save for retirement. We look at the true cost of caring.
-
Ground rents to be capped at £250 a year – what does it mean for you?The government has published draft legislation which would see ground rents capped at £250 per year for leaseholders. We examine what it means for homeowners and the housing market.
-
Our pension system, little-changed since Roman times, needs updatingOpinion The Romans introduced pensions, and we still have a similar system now. But there is one vital difference between Roman times and now that means the system needs updating, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
We’re doing well on pensions – but we still need to do betterOpinion Pensions auto-enrolment has vastly increased the number of people in the UK with retirement savings. But we’re still not engaged enough, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Older people may own their own home, but the young have better pensionsOpinion UK house prices mean owning a home remains a pipe dream for many young people, but they should have a comfortable retirement, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How to avoid a miserable retirementOpinion The trouble with the UK’s private pension system, says Merryn Somerset Webb, is that it leaves most of us at the mercy of the markets. And the outlook for the markets is miserable.
-
Young investors could bet on NFTs over traditional investmentsOpinion The first batch of child trust funds and Junior Isas are maturing. But young investors could be tempted to bet their proceeds on digital baubles such as NFTs rather than rolling their money over into traditional investments
-
Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accountsOpinion Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK banking system slightly less awful, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Pandemics, politicians and gold-plated pensionsAdvice As more and more people lose their jobs to the pandemic and the lockdowns imposed to deal with it, there’s one bunch of people who won’t have to worry about their future: politicians, with their generous defined-benefits pensions.
-
How the stamp duty holiday is pushing up house pricesOpinion Stamp duty is an awful tax and should be replaced by something better. But its temporary removal is driving up house prices, says Merryn Somerset Webb.