Chipmaker Arm gets a helping hand from Nvidia
Arm, the British chip designer, is to be sold to a US peer in a record deal for the industry. The consequences will be far-reaching.
Nvidia’s “blockbuster” takeover of UK chip designer Arm is already facing “growing opposition”, says The Daily Telegraph. Japanese technology investor Softbank bought Arm for £24bn in 2016; it now wants to sell it to the US technology company in a record deal for the semiconductor sector.
As soon as the £30bn deal was announced, Arm’s founder Hermann Hauser complained that it would deliver Britain into “American vassalage” by selling its “prime technology asset”. Hauser says a sale to Nvidia would mean “the decision about who Arm is allowed to sell to will be made in the White House”. The British government has pledged to investigate the deal, and China may follow suit.
Silicon Valley stardust
It’s true that the deal brings “regulatory, political and client risks”, including a chance that US politicians could prevent Arm exporting its products to China, says Alistair Osborne in The Times. The British government should also force Nvidia to make “hard commitments” about jobs.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
However, talk about the deal being equivalent to “letting Trump get his hands on Trident” is “scaremongering”. Arm may even benefit from some “Silicon Valley stardust”. After all, despite the two companies being roughly the same value in 2016, when Softbank bought Arm, Nvidia’s shares have since “rocketed tenfold”.
If anyone should be blamed, it’s the “timid” fund managers who preferred to bank “a quick 40% profit on the previous share price” and sell out to Softbank in 2016, says Nils Pratley in The Guardian. In retrospect, they would have done better to keep Arm independent and take a punt that it could “multiply in value” over a couple of decades.
Sadly, that mistake can’t be undone, so it’s best to let the deal go ahead, especially since Softbank now has too much debt and a “dented” reputation thanks to “ludicrous” punts on WeWork and other companies. Still, getting regulators and governments on board may “turn out to be the easy part” of the process, says Dan Gallagher in The Wall Street Journal. Arm provides the basic designs for the low-power central processor chips that form the “main brains” of smartphones and tablets.
So “nearly every company” that makes processors for mobile devices and other types of chips has a licensing relationship with Arm, including those that “either compete with Nvidia” or are planning to do so. Nvidia will therefore need to strike a “delicate balance” between “running its own chip business” and allowing Arm “a certain degree of independence”. Big companies have hitherto had “little choice” but to stick with Arm, says Richard Waters in the Financial Times. But this deal could lead to a “wave of investment” in rival open-source chip architecture from companies fearful of being taken advantage of by Nvidia. Eventually, Arm’s customers may switch to designing their own chip architectures to “ensure control” of their technology. Still, even losing an Apple or a Qualcomm “may not matter much” if Nvidia can use the tie-up to “consolidate its position” in the “key market” of data servers, making itself the “technology axis” for a “booming” industry of artificial-intelligence-powered devices.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Rightmove: Asking prices set to rise 2% in 2026 after post-Budget market reboundBuyers and sellers who held off in anticipation of the Budget will come back to the market and contribute to asking prices increasing next year, according to Rightmove
-
Coreweave is on borrowed timeAI infrastructure firm Coreweave is heading for trouble and is absurdly pricey, says Matthew Partridge
-
Coreweave is on borrowed timeAI infrastructure firm Coreweave is heading for trouble and is absurdly pricey, says Matthew Partridge
-
Renewable energy funds are stuck between a ROC and a hard placeRenewable energy funds were hit hard by the government’s subsidy changes, but they have only themselves to blame for their failure to build trust with investors
-
Profit from document shredding with RestoreRestore operates in a niche, but essential market. The business has exciting potential over the coming years, says Rupert Hargreaves
-
The war dividend – how to invest in defence stocks as the world arms upWestern governments are back on a war footing. Investors should be prepared, too, says Jamie Ward
-
Literacy Capital: A trust where great returns fund a good causeThere’s plenty to like about specialist private-equity trust Literacy Capital, says Max King
-
An AI bust could hit private credit – could it cause a financial crisis?Opinion Private credit is playing a key role in funding data centres. It may be the first to take the hit if the AI boom ends, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
8 of the best ski chalets for sale nowThe best ski chalets on the market – from a traditional Alpine-style chalet in Switzerland to an award-winning Modernist building in Japan’s exclusive ski areas
-
Did COP30 achieve anything to tackle climate change?The COP30 summit was a failure. But the world is going green regardless, says Simon Wilson