Thomas Knowles was born in 1782 in Hythe, Kent, and went on to work as a servant in London. He was declared insolvent in 1819 and 1825, before finally being admitted to debtors’ prison for several months in 1829. William Hole, who was also born in Hythe, in 1793, worked as an apprentice before moving to London to set up his own shop. Like Knowles, he also faced personal financial problems and was declared bankrupt in 1827. In 1836 the pair teamed up with two other bankrupts to form the Independent West Middlesex Fire and Life Assurance Company (IWM).
How did the scam work?
IWM offered annuities and life insurance at rates that were far more generous than the competition, supposedly backed up by £1m in capital. They claimed the Duke of Wellington was a policy-holder and rented plush offices in the West End of London to give the impression of wealth. In reality, it was run as an early Ponzi scheme. The money coming in that was left over from interest payments, and the operating expenses, were embezzled by the directors and spent on maintaining an extravagant lifestyle of servants and carriages.
What happened next?
By 1839 doubts were being raised in the press. An article in a Glasgow newspaper led many investors to demand their money back. A libel suit issued by the company enabled it to keep taking in money from investors for a while, but by the end of 1840 its offices were shut down and its staff and directors disappeared. Hole, who had left the company in 1839, was pursued by creditors and was eventually declared bankrupt and died in poverty. Knowles managed to escape to the continent and was later spotted gambling in the German resort town of Baden-Baden.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Lessons for investors
One estimate puts losses from the scam at between £160,000 (£14.5m today) and £240,000 (£21.8m); another puts them at £300,000 (£27.3m). Either way, thousands of policyholders who had handed over large sums to purchase annuities were left with nothing. The investors in the scheme should perhaps have realised that the high spread between annuity and life insurance rates, allowing investors buying both sets of policies simultaneously to earn an effective rate of 6% a year, should have raised suspicions since rival companies’ spreads were just 1.5%.
-
8 of the best energy-efficient properties for saleThe best energy-efficient properties for sale – from a HUF HAUS in London’s Dulwich Village to a contemporary property in the Lake District National Park
-
Revealed: the new £1 million UK postcodesWe look at some of the priciest parts of the UK, where properties are selling for £1 million or more
-
Find tomorrow’s Asian giants while they are still smaller companiesOpinion Nitin Bajaj, portfolio manager of the Fidelity Asian Values trust, picks three Asian companies to invest in.
-
AI will maintain Moody’s market lead, says Stephen ConnollyOpinion Veteran data provider Moody's has adapted well to the modern world, and is one of Warren Buffett’s longest-held investments
-
Is BlackRock World Mining gearing for a recovery?Opinion After a frustrating year, BlackRock World Mining is positioned for growth and to capitalise on the sector's recovery
-
Should you limit exposure to US tech stocks?An end to the AI boom would shake both US funds and global trackers. Here’s one way to trim exposure to US tech stocks
-
The mystery of America’s gold and why an audit mattersHow much gold does the US actually have? Dominic Frisby explains why it matters
-
Art vs AI: artists’ uprising takes on the botsAI performs impressively, but it’s all based on human work that was taken without payment. The government thinks this is fine. Copyright holders beg to differ
-
The benefits of a stock bubbleOpinion We tend to think of stock bubbles as bad things but, as the dotcom craze shows, good things can come from them, says Matthew Lynn
-
Why CEOs deserve a pay riseOpinion The CEOs of big companies often come under fire for being grossly overpaid. But the truth, as per some economists, is the opposite. Do they merit a pay rise?
