'The City's big bet on green finance fails to pay out'
Insurers and banks are backing away from “green finance”, and there is not much sign of the green boom we were promised. That’s a problem for the City, says Matthew Lynn
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
The City is meant to be leading the world in the drive towards “green finance”. But over the past few weeks, it has become clear that it has found reverse gear. Patrick Tiernan, the new CEO of the Lloyd's insurance market, a sector where London is still a world leader, last week indicated that syndicates would no longer be pressured into refusing to cover fossil fuels.
He stressed that the market wanted to be “apolitical”. Earlier in the month, the Net Zero Banking Alliance, a UN-sponsored initiative of which the former Bank of England governor Mark Carney was one of the founders, said it was pressing pause on its work after a whole series of major banks, including Goldman Sachs, HSBC and Barclays, decided to leave. Likewise, a lot of environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds are going to be looking a lot less healthy as the share price of Orsted, one of the favourite stocks for the sector, collapses. Shares in the Danish wind giant have halved in the past year. It turns out it’s a lot harder to make money from windmills than was first predicted. Add it all up, and one point is clear. The “green transition” investment story is turning very sour.
The City's bet on green finance fails to pay out
Much of it was virtue-signalling nonsense from the start. Whatever you think about climate change, fossil fuels are likely to be around for at least a couple more decades, even on the most optimistic scenarios, so it’s hard to see the point of not insuring the companies that produce them. It just meant there was no money to pay out compensation if something went wrong. Likewise, if the major banks refuse to finance fossil fuels, then the companies will just be forced to turn to hedge funds and private credit instead, and the risks will be far harder for central banks to monitor.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
At the same time, it was all very well to mobilise the fund-management industry behind green investment, but as Orsted has shown, just because you stamp “climate change” on a project doesn’t mean it will make any genuine profits. As subsidies get wound down, much of the sector turns out to be fundamentally unprofitable – and if the banks are too heavily exposed, they will only find themselves in trouble.
The City’s bet big on “green finance” driving its growth over the next couple of decades. Everyone knew that leaving the EU would pose a challenge to London as a financial centre, even if it was sometimes exaggerated. The City was the key financial hub for the bloc, financing government and corporate debt, and managing bond and equity issues. As some of that business drifted away, as it inevitably would, London was meant to turn itself into the global centre for “green finance” instead. It would become the place where the hundreds of billions that would have to be invested to transition from oil and gas to wind, solar and nuclear power would be financed, and where environmentally friendly companies could list, and where ESG fund management would flourish. It would be the world’s green finance centre, not just Europe’s. Cheerleaders such as Mark Carney predicted that green finance would be a $5 trillion market. It was the City’s future.
Green finance turns sour
This bet has not worked out well. Over the past five years, the City has stagnated. The number of new companies listed in London has shrunk to almost nothing, very few major bids have been launched, and there is not much sign of the green boom we were promised. That is about to become a lot more apparent as many of the deals struck over the past few years turn sour. We have already seen the best years of green finance, when governments were pouring unlimited sums of money into industries such as wind and solar. We are now seeing a retreat, and that will expose a lot of dud projects.
There has to be a reset. The City needs to start growing again and to replace the markets lost by Brexit. It is not going to be green finance, that much is now clear. London’s financial markets need to ditch the green delusion and move on as quickly as possible – and get back to businesses where they can actually make money.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
-
How a ‘great view’ from your home can boost its value by 35%A house that comes with a picturesque backdrop could add tens of thousands of pounds to its asking price – but how does each region compare?
-
What is a care fees annuity and how much does it cost?How we will be cared for in our later years – and how much we are willing to pay for it – are conversations best had as early as possible. One option to cover the cost is a care fees annuity. We look at the pros and cons.
-
Three key winners from the AI boom and beyondJames Harries of the Trojan Global Income Fund picks three promising stocks that transcend the hype of the AI boom
-
RTX Corporation is a strong player in a growth marketRTX Corporation’s order backlog means investors can look forward to years of rising profits
-
Profit from MSCI – the backbone of financeAs an index provider, MSCI is a key part of the global financial system. Its shares look cheap
-
"Botched" Brexit: should Britain rejoin the EU?Brexit did not go perfectly nor disastrously. It’s not worth continuing the fight over the issue, says Julian Jessop
-
'AI is the real deal – it will change our world in more ways than we can imagine'Interview Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates talks to Andrew Van Sickle about the AI bubble, the impact of tariffs on inflation and the outlook for gold and China
-
Should investors join the rush for venture-capital trusts?Opinion Investors hoping to buy into venture-capital trusts before the end of the tax year may need to move quickly, says David Prosser
-
Food and drinks giants seek an image makeover – here's what they're doingThe global food and drink industry is having to change pace to retain its famous appeal for defensive investors. Who will be the winners?
-
Tony Blair's terrible legacy sees Britain still sufferingOpinion Max King highlights ten ways in which Tony Blair's government sowed the seeds of Britain’s subsequent poor performance and many of its current problems