Furlough is ending – will unemployment spike?
The UK's Covid furlough scheme has drawn to a close. Saloni Sardana looks at how it might affect the economy.
Around one million Britons are expected to feel the pinch on their finances as the government’s furlough package came to an end yesterday.
The scheme – also known as the coronavirus job retention scheme – was unveiled on 20 March last year after Covid-19 ravaged many parts of the UK economy.
What was the furlough scheme?
Since the furlough scheme was introduced, it is believed to have helped around 11.6 million people. Now that it has come to an end, the jobs of one million people on furlough at the end of September are in question.
The scheme, which has so far has cost the taxpayer around £70bn, promised furloughed workers 80% of their wages up to £2,500, for the hours they cannot work.
As of July this year, employers had to contribute 10% for hours their staff do not work, increasing to 20% in August and September.
At the depths of the coronavirus crisis last year, more than 9.5 million people were on furlough. As a result, unemployment stood at just 4.6% in the three months to July, its lowest in 42 years.
While the scheme put a cap on widespread unemployment, its high cost, among other things, has made it controversial.
How damaging will the end of furlough be?
Commentators are divided as to what the end of furlough means for the UK economy. As AJ Bell’s financial analyst, Danni Hewson, points out, a true picture of the UK economy may only come to light now that furlough is coming to an end. “Furlough was a lifeline to many, but it acted like a curtain, hiding the real jobs picture. Now the curtain is being drawn back no one really knows how all the pieces of the jobs jigsaw will fit together.”
One of the reasons the Bank of England has held off raising interest rates despite higher inflation is the uncertainty over what the end of furlough may mean for the economy.
Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England’s governor, said that it was a “big puzzle” to see how there can be such a high level of vacancies, even though 1.6 million people are estimated to have been furloughed by July.
This may be because “employers have been hoarding labour, because they still expect demand to recover,” says the Financial Times.
Samuel Tombs of Pantheon Macroeconomics thinks many could still be “underemployed” if their employers give them their old jobs back, albeit at shorter hours.
But Julian Jessop, an economist and a fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, a think-tank, says some of the fears related to the end of the furlough scheme may be overdone: “There may be a short term bump in unemployment, but I think the level of unemployment will be a lot lower than many people feared at the beginning of the year,” he said.
While the tourism and airlines industry may still be exposed to bouts of uncertainty, he said, most of the currently furloughed workers are partially rather than fully furloughed.
This is also the view of the Resolution Foundation, another think tank, which concluded in its recent report that there are two main reasons one shouldn’t assume that many people will necessarily lose jobs once furlough ends.
First is that employers have been paying contributions towards wages for three months now. “This ‘skin in the game’ suggests that they will not be making all of their fully-furloughed staff redundant when the scheme ends, even if they had not yet done so by early September,” Resolution Foundation said.
Second is that the risk is much lower for those who are on partial furlough.
Will it affect investors?
There is no reason to panic just yet. Policymakers are likely to hold off any tightening of monetary policy until the true effect of lifting furlough is known and ultimately how the unemployment rate fares in coming months.
UK unemployment is expected to rise to 5.2% according to HM Treasury estimates.
And, as Jessop points out, many sectors of the economy have already rebounded sharply following the easing of Covid-19 restrictions, so it’s unlikely investors need to worry. But perhaps be cautious about hospitality sector stocks.