John is out of the office this week, so today guest writer Tim Price gives us his view on modern monetary theory (MMT) and inflation.
It is increasingly clear that while coronavirus has been something of a game-changer, it has also simply amplified trends that were already obvious prior to the spread of the disease. One of those trends is that government spending and related indebtedness had already become insupportable throughout the world.
Now, the system can only be perpetuated – and only then in the short term – by means of explicit financial repression. Handily for fiscally incontinent governments, they now have the perfect stalking horse behind which to continue their predations upon savers and investors: the convenient arrival of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT).
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Why inflation is welcome at first – right before disaster strikes
Analyst and financial historian Russell Napier, in his latest The Solid Ground advisory, takes Stephanie Kelton to task for her recent contribution to the MMT genre, The Deficit Myth: “Having previously described financial repression as a policy that is designed to ‘steal money from old people slowly’, it is very clear why MMT proponents would prefer not to mention the implications for savers from their policies”, writes Napier.
“What politician would endorse a policy that is designed to destroy savings, given the socio-political devastation that such destruction has wrought historically? Perhaps, more importantly, what savers would choose to subject their savings to such theft when it would be possible to move money out of a jurisdiction pursuing a MMT/financial repression policy?”
The mechanism by which financial repression operates is to keep interest rates below the rate of inflation. In other words, the aim is to inflate the debt away. At first, this may even seem welcome. As Jens O. Parsson wrote in his 1974 book, Dying of Money – Lessons of the Great German and American Inflations: “Everyone loves an early inflation. The effects at the beginning of an inflation are all good.”
He continues: “There is steepened money expansion, rising government spending, increased government budget deficits, booming stock markets, and spectacular general prosperity, all in the midst of temporarily stable prices. Everyone benefits, and no one pays.”
However, things soon change. “That is the early part of the cycle. In the later inflation, on the other hand, the effects are all bad.” Parsson outlines the issues: "The government may steadily increase the money inflation in order to stave off the later effects, but the later effects patiently wait.
“In the terminal inflation, there is faltering prosperity, tightness of money, falling stock markets, rising taxes, still larger government deficits, and still roaring money expansion, now accompanied by soaring prices and ineffectiveness of all traditional remedies. Everyone pays and no one benefits. That is the full cycle of every inflation.”
Incidentally, in something akin to the media equivalent of Gresham’s Law, good luck trying to pick up a (non-pirated) copy of Parsson’s book. It is listed as “currently unavailable” on Amazon, though you can, it would appear, secure a hardback copy on the site – for the best part of £400.
How to have the last laugh in this economic environment
We have, of course, had explicit state-sanctioned inflationism for the past decade or so, in the form of policies such as quantitative easing (QE), and a whole host of “boosterist” alphabet agencies dreamed up by the Federal Reserve, America’s central bank.
But coronavirus, and the haphazard and arbitrary government responses to it, have accelerated us towards the next phase of this global monetary experiment. Stockmarkets noticed the first wave, and the precious metals markets now appear to be acknowledging the second.
From Ludwig von Mises’ Human Action (1949): “But then finally the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. A breakdown occurs.
“The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against “real” goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time, within a few weeks or even days, the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper. Nobody wants to give away anything against them.
“It was this that happened with the Continental currency in America in 1781, with the French mandats territoriaux in 1796, and with the German mark in 1923. It will happen again whenever the same conditions appear. If a thing has to be used as a medium of exchange, public opinion must not believe that the quantity of this thing will increase beyond all bounds. Inflation is a policy that cannot last.”
It is not too late to try to inflation-proof your portfolio. The recent run by gold and (more lately) silver is probably due a pause, but not necessarily a full-blown reversal – not least because the monetary adventurism behind it shows absolutely no signs of abating.
We will maintain our exposures: to gold, to silver, and to sensibly-priced precious metals miners with little or no debt.
And because we can’t be certain as to what the future holds, we will continue to supplement those holdings with unconstrained “value” equities outside the world of bullion, and with funds that are quite simply uncorrelated to the stock and bond markets (especially the latter).
We intend, in other words, to try and have the last laugh. Not that there’s really that much to be laughing about.
• Tim Price is manager of the VT Price Value Portfolio (pricevaluepartners.com) and author of Investing Through the Looking Glass: a rational guide to irrational financial markets.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
-
Boost for over 100,000 families on Child Benefit as new HMRC payment system rolled outThousands of households will no longer have to pay the dreaded High Income Child Benefit Charge through self-assessment
-
Are you being haunted by the ghost of Christmas past? How festive cutbacks could boost your long-term wealthThe average family spends around £1,000 over the Christmas season. Here’s how much you could have gained if you had invested some of the money instead.
-
The steady rise of stablecoinsInnovations in cryptocurrency have created stablecoins, a new form of money. Trump is an enthusiastic supporter, but its benefits are not yet clear
-
Goodwin: A superlative British manufacturer to buy nowVeteran engineering group Goodwin has created a new profit engine. But following its tremendous run, can investors still afford the shares?
-
A change in leadership: Is US stock market exceptionalism over?US stocks trailed the rest of the world in 2025. Is this a sign that a long-overdue shift is underway?
-
Modern Monetary Theory and the return of magical thinkingThe Modern Monetary Theory is back in fashion again. How worried should we be?
-
Metals and AI power emerging marketsThis year’s big emerging market winners have tended to offer exposure to one of 2025’s two winning trends – AI-focused tech and the global metals rally
-
King Copper’s reign will continue – here's whyFor all the talk of copper shortage, the metal is actually in surplus globally this year and should be next year, too
-
The coming collapse in the jobs marketOpinion Once the Employment Bill becomes law, expect a full-scale collapse in hiring, says Matthew Lynn
-
Renewable energy funds are stuck between a ROC and a hard placeRenewable energy funds were hit hard by the government’s subsidy changes, but they have only themselves to blame for their failure to build trust with investors