There are many reasons why US stocks have massively outperformed over the last few decades – low interest rates have helped, as has the stunning success of America’s tech giants. But the huge gains have also been about America’s embrace of “optimisation”, says Edward Chancellor on Breakingviews.
In the name of efficiency, US companies have run down inventories and contracted out their manufacturing to the other side of the world (mostly to China) and replaced as much equity as possible with debt. This has worked absolute wonders for their return on equity (ROE). Last year listed US companies produced an ROE of 17% – against a mere 9% in Japan. No wonder investors have been keener on paying more for the former than the latter. Until now at least.
The new world is not like the old: “optimisation has rendered the corporate world more fragile”. Indebted companies are very vulnerable to recession and rising interest rates.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Those dependant on offshore manufacturing are vulnerable to supply-chain disruption – something that became nastily obvious during the pandemic – and given the war in Ukraine and endless brutal lockdowns in China this is clearly not a short-term problem. This tells us something very important about the thing companies should be prioritising in the 2020s: not efficiency, not optimisation, but slack.
Vertical integration is making a comeback: some luxury-goods brands are buying up their suppliers and chip giant Intel is planning to build its own plants in the US and in Germany. Just-in-time manufacturing is on the way out. Reshoring (something we have been talking about for some time at MoneyWeek) is very much on the way in.
The search for slack
The problem, of course, is that slack is hard to find, as the inflation numbers show: US inflation is now running at a 40-year high of 8.5%. There is significantly less than is comfortable in energy, far too little in most metals (including uranium) and nowhere near enough in agriculture.
How should investors react? First, make sure you are not overinvested in the companies that are going to need to buy in slack by moving manufacturing onshore, by cutting back on debt levels and by holding high levels of inventories (and which will have to take the hit to their margins and share prices and all that implies).
Second, invest in the firms that will be lack-of-slack winners – think about the fossil-fuel and mining companies that have been relatively capital starved over the last decade. Lack of supply and rising prices will be very nice for them. Of that 8.5% rise in US prices, 32% of it was down to rising energy prices.
Third, look for companies that never gave up their slack in the first place and have been underpriced as a result. There are still opportunities in the US. But for Chancellor this new dynamic means you have to look at Japan, “one of the few developed economies to have retained its manufacturing base” and one in which many companies still operate “with plenty of redundancy”.
-
Is the Office for National Statistics in turmoil?Britain’s statistics authority, the Office for National Statistics, is increasingly unfit for purpose. Why, and what can be done?
-
Saba Capital and Boaz Weinstein respond to investment trustsAs investment trust managers and industry experts accuse Saba of self-motivated opportunism, the hedge fund responds to specific "misleading claims" and sets out its stall
-
What investors can expect from stocks and the economy in 2025There are reasons for investors to be hopeful about 2025, with slowing interest rates and moderating oil prices. But trouble may be brewing in bond markets
-
MoneyWeek's five predictions for investors in 2025MoneyWeek's City columnist gazes into his crystal ball and sees five unexpected events in store for investors in 2025
-
Elon Musk to Taylor Swift - the four key figures who moved markets in 2024We look at the four most influential people in 2024 who moved markets – from Elon Musk reshaping US politics to Rachel Reeves struggling as Britain's chancellor
-
Will AI be the future of advertising?It remains to be seen, but the idea that AI providers can make money from advertising does not bode well
-
Why undersea cables are under threat – and how to protect themUndersea cables power the internet and are vital to modern economies. They are now vulnerable
-
Rouble hits two-year low against the dollar – what does it mean for Russia's economy?New US sanctions have plunged the rouble to its lowest level since 2022. Why are investors spooked and how will this affect Putin's economy?
-
Has Javier Milei succeeded in transforming Argentina's economy?Javier Milei won an election last year on an “anarcho-capitalist” platform, promising to take a chainsaw to the overbearing and bloated state. How’s it going?
-
Brazil booms – but why do investors remain wary?Brazil is booming, but you wouldn’t think so from looking at the stock market. What's behind the market paranoia?
