The booming jobs market points to inflation lasting for longer
It’s a good time to be looking for a job, with plenty of vacancies and wages rising. But higher wagers are driving inflation up – and it’s not just a temporary thing. John Stepek explains what it means for your money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb376/bb376ba3e7cf99110f7f0d3cbf29b4d822b8ba59" alt="Delivery driver"
The biggest debate in markets right now is whether inflation is transitory or not.
This matters. If inflation goes away, we can go back to low interest rates and soaring growth stocks and a contained bond market.
If it doesn’t – well, we might be looking at a lot more volatility in the likes of the Nasdaq and government bond markets than anyone is used to
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b64/a0b64dc4570f2901441dfc9e97a62ae665f79e04" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg"
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The recruitment business is booming
There’s an interesting stockmarket update from London-listed recruitment company Robert Walters this morning.
Its trading statement for last quarter notes that the company had a record December, and that profit will be ahead of expectations (the share price is only up about 1.5% or so this morning, so clearly the market already expected it to beat expectations, which is one of the many wonderful paradoxes of markets).
So what’s happened? Recruiters are effectively people brokers. A company wants to find someone, but wants to offload some of the hassle of the actual recruitment process. A recruiter does the stuff in the middle, and hopefully introduces candidates who fit the bill more efficiently than if the company undertook the process itself.
So they make their money when there’s a lot of activity in the job market. And right now, it seems that employers are in a hiring frenzy. “Permanent and interim recruitment activity were the strongest drivers of growth as organisations continued to confidently hire for the longer-term.”
Robert Walters is global, and every single one of its territories saw a big rise in fee income, from China to Japan to Australia to France to the UK, not to mention Latin America.
According to the chief executive – Robert Walters – “we are seeing candidate shortages across all locations and disciplines, a fierce competition for talent and wage inflation kicking in which together create huge opportunities across the recruitment market.”
Inflation isn’t all about Covid
Why did this catch my eye this morning? One of the big debates about the recent bout of inflation we’ve seen has been whether it’s transitory or not.
Central banks have ditched the term “transitory” because it made them look stupid. People thought they meant “short-term”, they say, whereas what they really meant was that the factors driving inflation are all about the pandemic, and that they will go away once the pandemic goes away (I’d argue that they got caught by surprise, but let’s just let them play their word games).
In all fairness to central banks, I can see what they mean. If inflation is basically all about big queues building up at ports around the world mainly because we switched the global economy off and on again in an attempt to thwart Covid transmission (a debate for another day), then, given a bit of time, all those kinks should iron out as the pig passes through the python (as it were).
But that doesn’t seem to be what’s happening. Here are two things which are true in aggregate: 1) companies don’t raise wages unless they have to and 2) companies don’t pass on costs unless they can.
For at least the last two decades, we’ve been in an environment where companies didn’t have to raise wages, but they also struggled to pass on costs. Demographics (cheap young globalised labour) plus disinflation (driven by the internet and tech generally, cheap energy, and the resulting rampant competition) made this world possible.
Capital (those who make their money by owning stuff) benefited at the expense of labour (those who make their money by selling their time).
Are we facing a wage-price spiral?
But something has changed now. It’s very clear that companies are thus far a) willing to pay higher wages where necessary and b) willing to pass those costs onto customers. The latter is only possible because c) customers are willing to pay those costs.
I’m not saying we’re in a wage-price spiral, but one of the defining characteristics of said spiral is that everyone plays an ongoing game of pass-the-parcel. Companies pay higher wages to workers who are also consumers. As consumers, workers can then pay the costs being passed on by companies. Rising costs mean workers demand higher wages. And so on.
You can argue about what is driving this. I would say that Covid has – as it has in many other places – just accelerated a trend that was already in place.
Globalisation (cheap overseas labour and inconsequential transit costs) had already peaked, but Covid travel restrictions have put it into overdrive, while soaring energy costs won’t help either.
Demographics were already turning against the cheap labour argument, but now suddenly the papers are all talking about the fertility crisis like it only just became apparent (my colleague Merryn was ahead of the game, as ever).
In short, I don’t think this is “transitory” or just a kink in the system. I think this is a major shift in the underlying economic environment. And while it’s quite possible that we see a drop in the sheer scale of inflation in the coming months which lulls everyone into a false sense of security, I don’t think that means we can relax.
I’d make sure your portfolio is ready, just in case. For more on all of this make sure you read MoneyWeek magazine every week. Get your first six issues free here.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
Spot the Dog: £67bn in underperforming funds revealed
Around 137 funds consistently underperformed their benchmark, BestInvest's Spot the Dog report finds. Which funds are in the dog house?
By Katie Williams Published
-
What does a BP and Shell merger mean for the UK oil industry?
BP’s struggles have made it vulnerable to a takeover. Could it merge with Shell to create a British behemoth?
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Trapped in a time of zombie government
It’s not just companies that are eking out an existence, says Max King. The state is in the twilight zone too.
By Max King Published
-
America is in deep denial over debt
The downgrade in America’s credit rating was much criticised by the US government, says Alex Rankine. But was it a long time coming?
By Alex Rankine Published
-
Bank of England raises interest rates to 5.25%
The Bank has hiked rates from 5% to 5.25%, marking the 14th increase in a row. We explain what it means for savers and homeowners - and whether more rate rises are on the horizon
By Ruth Emery Published
-
UK inflation remains at 8.7% ‒ what it means for your money
Inflation was unmoved at 8.7% in the 12 months to May. What does this ‘sticky’ rate of inflation mean for your money?
By John Fitzsimons Published
-
VICE bankruptcy: how did it happen?
Was the VICE bankruptcy inevitable? We look into how the once multibillion-dollar came crashing down.
By Jane Lewis Published
-
Would a food price cap actually work?
Analysis The government is discussing plans to cap the prices of essentials. But could this intervention do more harm than good?
By Nicole García Mérida Published
-
UK inflation slides to 8.7% - what does it mean for your money?
News Inflation has dropped below 10% for the first time in months, but with food prices at a 45-year high, is this good news and what does it mean for your money?
By Tom Higgins Published
-
Why the UK equity market is shrinking
Analysis The crisis has been building for 25 years, says Max King, and it will take decades to reverse the trend.
By Max King Published