You can now buy a digital dress. You send a picture of yourself to a designer. He dresses you virtually, "digitally rendering" the clothes onto your body, says The Times. You can then stick pictures of the digitally-done you all over Instagram and Facebook. You'll get lots of likes. You will also never wear or touch the dress. It will never actually leave social media. That makes it just like a modern political manifesto.
The Lib Dems' one is nothing but pointless showing off. The more Jo Swinson gets out and about, the less popular she appears to get her policies aren't ever leaving Twitter. The Labour one is obviously unachievable nonsense. Its free-broadband-for-everyone policy alone will cost around 4.5% of our entire national output. The public knows this of course: a YouGov/Times survey suggests only 18% of people think Labour's ideas are remotely "realistic". Even a quarter of the few committed Labour voters left think the manifesto is "unaffordable". They are right policies that can only be financed by huge tax hikes and ludicrously large levels of public borrowing rarely begin (or end) well.
What then of the Tories? How much of their manifesto will make it off Twitter and into reality? It is definitely very much less of a digital dress than the rest. But it still involves more, not less public spending, something that assumes that the UK tax take can rise from here (mostly via loophole closing and aggressive anti-tax evasion measures). That's not ideal. Dominic looks at why in this week's magazine.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
His key point? Medieval serfs were forced to work for their feudal lords for half the week in return for the right to survive. These days, one way or another, you hand over about 47% of all you earn to the state. You get very significantly more back from your protector than the serf could have dared dream of (which is nice) but, unless you up sticks and leave the country (which he could not), you don't get much more choice in the matter of where the money you earn goes than he did. This isn't how countries get or stay rich. It also, in general, tends not to offer much in the way of real value to taxpayers: all too often state-run services cost too much and achieve too little (see our briefing on the NHS in this week' smagazine).
Sticking with the theme of value, you might not be going to get it from our digitally-dressed government contenders but you can certainly get it in the stockmarket. The valuation gap between growth stocks and value stocks is at an extraordinarily high level. That's unlikely to last much longer particularly in the UK where there is a very real possibility of a post-election "Boris bounce" (or relief bounce). Turn to this week's cover story for Matthew's take on why now is the time for value investors to shine and the stocks that might help them do so. If you want to add even more value to your portfolio, keep an eye on London's fintech scene. Right now you pay for every trade you make. You don't pay much relative to what you paid 20 years ago. But nonetheless, if you are a frequent trader, even £5 a go adds up. Good news then that free trading is on the way. Finally, I'd like to say thank you to all our brilliant speakers and engaged audience members at the MoneyWeek Wealth Summit last week. It was, I think, a huge success I had a wonderful day and hope you all did too.
-
Cash in on the growth prospects of Europe's companiesOpinion Marcel Stötzel, co-portfolio manager of the Fidelity European Trust, selects three stocks
-
Is the AI boom another dotcom bubble?25 years on from the dotcom bubble bursting, is it time for investors to consider the sustainability of the AI boom in the stock market?
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Everything is getting more expensive – including moneyEditor's letter Investors are about to start feeling rather more pain, says Merryn Somerset Webb – from the rising price of money.
-
We may be heading for recession – and it will be no ordinary recessionEditor's letter Just as the downturn in 2020 was not a typical recession. the next downturn could be very different too, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
What companies should be prioritising this decadeEditor's letter In a world beset by uncertainty, companies should be prioritising slack over efficiency, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
