How capitalism has been undermined by poor governance

Two beer companies control 90% of the US market

(Image credit: © FRANCOIS PICARD/AFP via Getty Image)

published 18 August 2022

One of the most intriguing statistics in economic history is that in 1914 Argentina was richer than Germany. Its GDP per head was 92% of the average of 16 developed economies. In 2014, its income per capita was 43% of those same 16 economies. Why? “There is a lot of ruin in a nation,” said Adam Smith. But not an unlimited amount. Economies can shrug off a great deal of poor governance, but Argentina breached the limit. Dictatorships, a poor education system and statist, populist policymaking were fertile ground for hyperinflation in the 1990s and recent debt crises.

What about the developed world?

The result, says economist Jonathan Tepper, is no competition. The US has only four major airlines, three principal cereal-makers, and two beer groups (controlling 90% of the market). Duopolies and oligopolies raise the cost of goods and keep salaries low, as the big brands have scant competition for labour. The rise of regulation has been key, too. Big firms can cope with the cost of compliance, small ones can’t. Enterprise suffers as fewer small firms thrive; income and wealth inequality increase.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Or take central banks, which have also exacerbated wealth inequality in the past 25 years by blowing up asset bubbles, often with printed money, every time markets have slid. So house prices are now too high, prompting governments to stoke demand yet further with schemes such as Help to Buy. Keeping interest rates low or below zero encouraged speculation and prolonged the lives of unviable companies, or “zombies”. These absorb capital that would be better spent on new projects (resources are inefficiently allocated) and dent overall productivity. In normal times, they would be swept away to make way for new blood: the process of “creative destruction”.

Andrzej Rzonca, a former member of Poland’s Monetary Policy Council, notes in the Financial Times that around 10% of US firms are zombies. In Europe, “ultra-low interest rates – through zombification and resulting misallocation – lowered productivity, slowing GDP growth by up to 3% in the years following the financial crash”. The upshot? “The saving grace of capitalism, its often cruel efficiency, is steadily being lost,” says Bloomberg columnist John Authers. As more and more people come to feel the system isn’t working for them, they may be more inclined to give the cruel inefficiency of socialism a go. Then there would be even more ruin in the nation.

Explore More

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.