When we invest, we all like to think we are getting a good deal on the fund or stock we are buying. If we didn't, why would we do it? Look at things in simple terms like that and you could say that, while investment managers claim to use one style or another (usually "value" or "growth"), they are pretty much all effectively value investors.
But it is actually a tad more complicated. A real value investor buys something because it is cheap in absolute terms it trades at less than the value of its physical assets; it is on a price/earnings ratio of less than eight (or so); it has a sustainable dividend yield, several percentage points higher than the market average that sort of thing.
A growth investor buys something that looks like it has value relative to its forecast growth. It isn't cheap in absolute terms but it will be in five years if it grows as the buyer thinks it will. See what I mean? Totally different things. Now that's sorted out, let's think about which style is best for now.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Life, politics and economics are always fraught with uncertainty. But I don't think it's too "out there" to suggest there's a little extra in the mix just now for markets particularly given how expensive the biggest of them (the US) is. So I want to be invested in areas that have as little uncertainty in them as possible where the "margin of safety" is the highest. I want value now, not at some unforecastable future date.
This isn't a particularly popular view. The analysts at FundExpert note that value funds have had a tough time since 2007 last year was the first in a long time that many of them made it to the top of the performance charts. At the same time, one value manager sent me a chart this week showing that just 15% of income funds have a "majority bias towards a value investment style". That I find very odd, given that having a high dividend yield is a "classic sign of a value investment". The key point is a happy one: the area we want to be in is unloved so there is plenty of scope for gain.
You'll be wondering where to look for all this value. It's actually all over the place. There are a few good value funds (look at the ones from Schroders and note that our own Tim Price runs a fund of value funds). But in this week's issue,we also look at Japan, where the market offers not just a good dividend yield but also a rising one. In our roundtable, we look at the some of the UK-focused stocks that have sold off in the rush to buy exporters on the back of weak pound. Try Sports Direct, says Fleet Street Letter editor Charlie Morris.
Bob Catto suggests some very cheap small caps, including a tiny company that could be producing the "Holy Grail of renewables" (a cheap, efficient battery). Finally, James Harries brings us back to one of our long-term favourite value investments German residential property with the suggestion of Vonovia, a fund that brings with it a "call option on European politics". Anyone who tells you there is nothing cheap to buy out there is clearly just looking in the wrong place.
-
House prices rise 2.9% – will the recovery continue?House prices grew by 2.9% on an annual basis in September. Will Budget policies and ‘higher-for-longer’ rates dent the recovery?
-
Nvidia earnings: what to expectNvidia announces earnings after market close on 20 November. What should investors expect from the semiconductor giant?
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
