Banks pass stress test

Britain’s seven biggest lenders have passed the second round of annual stress tests – but how resilient are the tests?

11-12-3-SC-634

Standard Chartered passed, but it's on the naughty step

Britain's seven biggest lenders have passed the second round of annual stress tests to establish their resilience to a sharp economic downturn. This test was based on an emerging-markets crisis, whereby a plunge in Chinese growth to 1.7% rattled the markets, sending oil below $40 a barrel and undermining developing countries and Europe.

Bank of England Governor Mark Carney said the banks were now far more resilient than in 2008-2009, and within sight of what the Bank's Financial Policy Committee (FPC) deems adequate capital buffers for the long term.

What the commentators said

While all seven "technically passed, only five really did, with two somewhat on the naughty step", said James Quinn in The Daily Telegraph. Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, Nationwide and Santander were fine. RBS and Standard Chartered didn't meet their capital requirements under the stress scenario. But as the test was based on 2014 accounts, and since then both have raised more money in any case, they won't have to submit plans to top up funds.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Sorry, but the "imagined stress" in emerging markets hardly seems that severe, said Patrick Hosking in the same paper. Chinese growth of 1.7%? "Are recessions really so impossible in China?" More disconcerting, though, is the longer-term "climbdown on capital levels". After the crisis, regulators were talking about a buffer worth 18% of risk-weighted assets. Now the Bank says 11% will do.

It's certainly a "mighty leap downwards", agreed The Guardian's Nils Pratley. Perhaps it suggests that "today's central bankers just have complete faith in their ability to spot dangers"? We should certainly beware the Bank's new-found optimism that the sector has moved out of the "post-crisis period", said Osborne. That kind of talk "probably means the next one's a fortnight away".

Andrew Van Sickle
Editor, MoneyWeek

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.