AstraZeneca fight rumbles on

The proposed takeover of AstraZeneca is proving to be one of the most controversial yet.

The £63bn takeover offer for Anglo-Swedish pharmaceutical group AstraZeneca by its US rival Pfizer is shaping up to be one of the most controversial takeover battles to involve a UK-based company.

British politicians fear that the enlarged Pfizer would cut research spending in the UK, endangering jobs and damaging Britain's science base. On the other side of the Atlantic, there has been considerable criticism of Pfizer's proposal to domicile the combined group in the UK for tax purposes.

In the past week, Pfizer's chief executive appeared before MPs in an attempt to reassure them about his firm's plans for investment and employment. Meanwhile, the firm is reported to be planning an increased hostile bid if it's unable to win the support of AstraZeneca's board.

What the commentators said

Normally in these situations, the takeover will go ahead as seen in Kraft's acquisition of Cadbury in 2010. Dangle the prospect of "jam today" in front of shareholders and they will bite, regardless of whether it represents a good long-term outcome.

This reflects the "dysfunctional nature of the relationship" between company management, fund managers, the investors in the funds they run and the rest of society, agreed John Plender in the FT.

Executives are incentivised to boost short-term earnings through takeovers and cost-cutting, while fund managers are judged on short-term performance and leap at the chance to make a profit.

Yet there is ample evidence that takeovers are "a highly effective mechanism for uncreative destruction" rather than a boon to either investors or the economy: take Pfizer itself, which has spent $240bn on three big takeovers in 15 years, yet has a market cap today of just $185bn. "The only consistent winners are the investment bankers and other advisers."

That may be true in general, but this particular deal "is a poor test case for almost any question about big corporate acquisitions", said Edward Hadas on Breakingviews.com.

"The would-be US acquirer, the British target, the UK government and the whole pharmaceutical industry are all tainted. They are guilty, respectively, of a tax fixation, cutting research, empty words and inadequate drug discovery. So there is really no one with the moral authority to say whether this is a good deal."

The best outcome would be for the UK and US to tackle the weakest part of the bid: Pfizer's attempt to game the tax system. If the firm is still interested after that, it can come back with a fresh bid.

Recommended

The unscientific criticism of AstraZeneca could do lasting damage
Biotech stocks

The unscientific criticism of AstraZeneca could do lasting damage

Several European countries have suspended their use of AstraZeneca's Covid vaccine – for no good scientific reason. Matthew Partridge reports.
18 Mar 2021
AstraZeneca turns the tables as it acquires US pharmaceutical firm Alexion
Biotech stocks

AstraZeneca turns the tables as it acquires US pharmaceutical firm Alexion

AstraZeneca, the British pharma giant, was almost swallowed up by Pfizer a few years ago. Now it has struck a megadeal of its own. Matthew Partridge r…
17 Dec 2020
The MoneyWeek Podcast: picking stocks is fun, but you need to do your homework
Investment strategy

The MoneyWeek Podcast: picking stocks is fun, but you need to do your homework

John Stepek talks to Steve Clapham, investor, analyst and author of The Smart Money Method, about the dangers in picking individual stocks and why you…
8 Apr 2021
BP looks set to return more money to shareholders as it beats expectations
Energy stocks

BP looks set to return more money to shareholders as it beats expectations

Oil major BP is to embark on a share buyback programme after significantly reducing its debts. Saloni Sardana looks at what it means for your portfoli…
6 Apr 2021

Most Popular

The bitcoin bubble will burst: here’s how to play it
Bitcoin

The bitcoin bubble will burst: here’s how to play it

The cryptocurrency’s price has soared far beyond its fundamentals, says Matthew Partridge. Here, he looks at how to short bitcoin.
12 Apr 2021
Central banks are rushing to build digital currencies. What are they, and what do they mean for you?
Bitcoin

Central banks are rushing to build digital currencies. What are they, and what do they mean for you?

As bitcoin continues to soar in value, many of the world’s central banks are looking to emulate it by issuing their own digital currencies. But centra…
8 Apr 2021
Four investment trusts for income investors to buy now
Investment trusts

Four investment trusts for income investors to buy now

Some high-yielding listed lending funds have come through the crisis with flying colours. David Stevenson picks four of the best.
12 Apr 2021