In this week's interview, I talk to Dr Pippa Malmgren, financial policy expert and former adviser to George W Bush.
She's full of interesting thoughts on inflation and the velocity of money. But one thing we touched on that I would like to have spent more time on was the ongoing failure of our banking system to fulfil its usual purpose lending money to individuals and companies.
In the UK, we hear endless complaints from smaller and medium-sized companies about how hard they find it to borrow money. Either they can't get it at all, or they can't get it at a price that makes any sense.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It is, I am told, entirely normal these days to be offered a loan, but be charged an arrangement fee of 8% of the value, regardless of how short-term the loan is.
It's a strange situation we find ourselves in. Savers are awash with money they can't get a return on. Yet borrowers happy to pay 6%, 7% or 8% can't get their hands on the money without paying extortionate fees. The good news is that, as Malmgren says, "money is like water". It always finds its way through the cracks in any system to the highest returns.
Today, it is doing that via a new shadow banking system made up of peer-to-peer (P2P) lenders, invoice financiers, crowdfunders and corporate lenders. This matters. It matters, because, as Malmgren suggests, it hints at a rising velocity of money (the first prerequisite for rising inflation).
But it also matters, because it's deeply disruptive to the conventional financial industry. Right now, it may not seem like a threat at the end of 2013, the UK's online lending platforms hadn't even lent out £1bn. In the US, they had yet to pass the $5bn mark. But that doesn't mean they won't.
Why? They have a cogent and constantly improving proposition (look out for the new offering from Nicola Horlick, Money & Co it's very impressive and consumer friendly). They are likely to remain relatively lightly regulated relative to banks they don't engage in fractional lending or create money, so don't need heavy regulation.
Finally, they are likely to attract heavy institutional investment on the basis that they offersome pretty appealing characteristics low volatility and low correlation to other assets, alongside an attractive yield.
Not convinced?Sloan FellowPaul Jeffery says think back to the 1970s. Then, as now, institutional investors were desperate for a way to make real (after-inflation) yields. They found them in junk bonds: from 1977 to 1985 these went from being 3.7% of outstanding US corporate debt to 14.5%.
A move of that scale in the P2P and crowdfunding businesses (there's no reason why there shouldn't be one) would see the "windfilled sails" of the new platforms become a "Schumpeterian gale of destruction for the banks". We haven't been keen on shares in the UK's big banks for a long time. We still aren't.
-
Why CEOs deserve a pay riseOpinion The CEOs of big companies often come under fire for being grossly overpaid. But the truth, as per some economists, is the opposite. Do they merit a pay rise?
-
Europe prepares to stand alone as Trump turns on UkraineSupport for old military alliances is wavering in the US under Donald Trump. Europe’s leaders are rushing to fill the void. Simon Wilson reports
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery aheadEditor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax risesEditor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Things may look bad – but they’re not that badEditor's letter The UK faces plenty of problems, says John Stepek. But things may not be as bad as they look. Our debt to GDP ratio is lower than many other major economies, and high employment means a healthy tax take. That gives the new chancellor room to cut taxes so people can keep more of their own money.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
