Comedian Russell Brand has gained a lot of column inches over his disillusionment with our political system. I watched his interview with Newsnight's Jeremy Paxman on Youtube to see what all the fuss was about. What could he have said that was so profound, so radical, to have got so many people talking?
It was a letdown. Brand boasts a passing resemblance to Che Guevara and he's giving voice to a sense of outraged, foot-stomping impotence that it's easy to empathise with. But in terms of content, it's drivel like watching a precocious 14-year-old rant at an indulgent uncle.
In short, there's too much inequality in the world, and it's the fault of evil corporations and their puppet politicians particularly, in some not-entirely-explained-way, Tory politicians. So don't vote, because it only encourages them. If you've ever been to a debate in a student union (or in the bar afterwards), you've heard it all before.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
But it's not what he said, it's his rapt reception that matters. The real significance of Brand's apparent mass appeal is that it just encourages politicians to pursue more soundbite-ready, populist measures in the hope of winning the next election and, as a handy side-effect, to extract more tax to pay off our huge debts.
They won't tackle real problems if you want to address wealth inequality in the UK, you would start by ending the very favourable tax treatment of property, and we all know what a vote-loser that would be.
And they won't target the super-rich' everyone complains about, for the simple reason that like it or not the super-rich are fantastically well-equipped to dodge tax, so no matter how hard you try, you're never going to get much out of them.
And, of course, no one dare say boo' to the banks, because rather than force them and their bondholders to take their losses when the crash happened, we chose the slow and steady route to get us out of this mess which is again all tied into the sad obsession with property that dominates our economy.
So who will pay? Unpopular industries such as utilities and payday lenders (who deal with their customers far more transparently than the banks ever do). And anyone with savings who lacks the scale of wealth and the knowledge or mobility to shelter them easily. What does this mean for you?
You can expect the government whatever its stripe to be more hostile towards any attempts to save significant sums, and you're going to have to be nimble and ready to use whatever tax breaks remain open to you. We'll look at this more in a future issue.
And if you're still keen on revolution, give Brand a miss and have a read of some genuinely fresh ideas from regular MoneyWeek contributor Dominic Frisby his book Life After The State came out this week. You can pick it up on Amazon, and it'll give you a lot more food for thought than anything Brand trots out.
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery aheadEditor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax risesEditor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
