M&S recovery has momentum: will it stick?
After years of decline, M&S seems to have turned a corner. But is this just a “dead cat bounce”?


For years, the retailer Marks & Spencer (M&S) was a byword for poor performance. Unfashionable clothes and lack of investment in stores, along with the general decline of the high street in the face of online shopping, are just some of the reasons put forward to explain the fact that its share price peaked back in 2007. A succession of leaders have tried to reboot the company, but until recently their efforts failed to stop its decline, as shown by the fact that its share price fell by roughly 80% between May 2015 and October 2022.
However, over the past two years, the shares have staged a comeback, more than tripling from a low of below 94p to 339p now. So has the business finally turned the corner, or is this just a “dead cat bounce”?
What's behind the M&S turnaround?
Some of the recent improvement is down to factors beyond M&S’s control. Like other retailers, it initially benefited from the end of the pandemic and the return of consumers to the high street. Problems with rival Waitrose have also led some shoppers to switch to M&S for food. Meanwhile, the recent cost-of-living crisis has seen many clothes buyers focus on affordable quality at the expense of high fashion.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
However, it’s hard to dispute that M&S deserves credit for embracing online sales, which now account for nearly a third of revenue. The company has also cut costs by boosting efficiencies, especially in logistics. It has closed down tired and poorly performing stores in favour of newer, more modern stores in better locations. Just two years into a long-term reorganisation, the potential gains are far from exhausted. At the same time, the closure of several well-known rival brands on the high street, as well as the continued expansion of its online businesses, should also help.
Overall, M&S has seen sales grow by just under 50% over the past three years, with its profits expanding fivefold during the same period. Sales are expected to keep growing over the next few years. Another sign that it has turned the corner is the decision at the end of last year to resume paying the dividend that it stopped during the pandemic. Operating margins have also gone up and it is achieving a double-digit return on capital employed. Despite this, the shares trade at only 12 times forecast 2026 earnings – the same valuation as Tesco and Sainsbury’s, both of which have been less successful recently.
As well as the strong prospects and cheap valuation, M&S’s share price continues to exhibit positive momentum. It is currently trading above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, and has been the third best-performing share in the FTSE 100 (including dividends) over the past six months, only slightly behind Darktrace and Hargreaves Lansdown, which have been taken over. I would therefore suggest going long at the current price of 339p at £14 per 1p, with a stop loss of 269p. This would give you a total potential downside of £980.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.
He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.
Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.
As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.
Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri
-
Revolut launches its first stocks and shares ISA with BlackRock and Vanguard ETFs
A year after getting its UK banking licence, Revolut is now launching its first stocks and shares ISA with a suite of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from BlackRock and Vanguard.
-
What does Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ mean for the US economy?
Donald Trump’s budget bill will slash taxes, but is expected to add at least $3 trillion to US national debt
-
End of “fleecehold”: Will leasehold reforms bring an end to the UK's feudal system?
Britain’s feudal system of property ownership is being overhauled. It's about time, says Simon Wilson
-
Airtel Africa is dialling the right numbers – should you buy?
Opinion Mobile phone services group Airtel Africa is inexpensive and growing fast
-
How Labour could crack the UK's growth conundrum
Opinion Planning and state procurement are key to productivity, says David C. Stevenson
-
Trouble brews in B&M as bargain shops take a hit
Opinion Once a stock market darling, B&M's share price has slumped. What has gone wrong for bargain shops?
-
'Angela Rayner taking charge of government policy is a frightening prospect for UK economy'
Opinion Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner is making moves to change the direction of our government. That should terrify us all, says Matthew Lynn
-
'Nationalisation is not the answer'
Opinion Labour's enthusiasm for nationalising steel was met with approval across the spectrum. Political consensus is a sign that thinking has been abandoned, says Max King
-
Why did the government take over British Steel – and was it a good idea?
The government has stepped in to take control, not ownership, of British Steel, citing national security and other factors. But does that make sense?
-
'Rachel Reeves' plan to force pension funds into UK assets won't work'
Opinion Hustling pension fund cash into British assets sounds like a good idea. It would be better to make Britain an attractive place to invest, says Matthew Lynn