For years, the retailer Marks & Spencer (M&S) was a byword for poor performance. Unfashionable clothes and lack of investment in stores, along with the general decline of the high street in the face of online shopping, are just some of the reasons put forward to explain the fact that its share price peaked back in 2007. A succession of leaders have tried to reboot the company, but until recently their efforts failed to stop its decline, as shown by the fact that its share price fell by roughly 80% between May 2015 and October 2022.
However, over the past two years, the shares have staged a comeback, more than tripling from a low of below 94p to 339p now. So has the business finally turned the corner, or is this just a “dead cat bounce”?
What's behind the M&S turnaround?
Some of the recent improvement is down to factors beyond M&S’s control. Like other retailers, it initially benefited from the end of the pandemic and the return of consumers to the high street. Problems with rival Waitrose have also led some shoppers to switch to M&S for food. Meanwhile, the recent cost-of-living crisis has seen many clothes buyers focus on affordable quality at the expense of high fashion.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
However, it’s hard to dispute that M&S deserves credit for embracing online sales, which now account for nearly a third of revenue. The company has also cut costs by boosting efficiencies, especially in logistics. It has closed down tired and poorly performing stores in favour of newer, more modern stores in better locations. Just two years into a long-term reorganisation, the potential gains are far from exhausted. At the same time, the closure of several well-known rival brands on the high street, as well as the continued expansion of its online businesses, should also help.
Overall, M&S has seen sales grow by just under 50% over the past three years, with its profits expanding fivefold during the same period. Sales are expected to keep growing over the next few years. Another sign that it has turned the corner is the decision at the end of last year to resume paying the dividend that it stopped during the pandemic. Operating margins have also gone up and it is achieving a double-digit return on capital employed. Despite this, the shares trade at only 12 times forecast 2026 earnings – the same valuation as Tesco and Sainsbury’s, both of which have been less successful recently.
As well as the strong prospects and cheap valuation, M&S’s share price continues to exhibit positive momentum. It is currently trading above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, and has been the third best-performing share in the FTSE 100 (including dividends) over the past six months, only slightly behind Darktrace and Hargreaves Lansdown, which have been taken over. I would therefore suggest going long at the current price of 339p at £14 per 1p, with a stop loss of 269p. This would give you a total potential downside of £980.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
8 of the best houses for sale for around £500,000Some of the best houses for sale for around £500,000 – from a 19th-century stone farm cottage in North Yorkshire and a two-bedroom apartment in Edinburgh’s New Town to a converted Methodist chapel in Norfolk
-
What will the unravelling of US-China trade mean for the economy?What will a US-China decoupling mean for the global economy?
-
Why did the government take over British Steel – and was it a good idea?The government has stepped in to take control, not ownership, of British Steel, citing national security and other factors. But does that make sense?
-
'Rachel Reeves' plan to force pension funds into UK assets won't work'Opinion Hustling pension fund cash into British assets sounds like a good idea. It would be better to make Britain an attractive place to invest, says Matthew Lynn
-
What caused the Birmingham bin strike – and what does it mean for British businesses?The Birmingham bin strike is the fallout from an equal-pay claim brought by female cleaners. That bodes ill for the rest of British business
-
A new wealth tax is a terrible idea. The rich are already being hit by sneaky taxes – Merryn Somerset WebbOpinion Ideologues want to squeeze more tax out of the rich with a wealth tax. They’re already wrung dry, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
Why are energy bills so expensive in the UK?Electricity bills in the UK are higher than in any comparable rich country. Some blame the net-zero zealotry of the government for that. What is really to blame for high energy bills?
-
Five years on: what did Covid cost us?We’re still counting the costs of the global coronavirus pandemic – and governments’ responses. What did we learn?
-
London can lure Brexit-fleeing banks back to UK – but the City must move quicklyOpinion Many banks fled to Paris in the wake of Brexit but are now in full-scale retreat. The City should move quickly to lure them back, says Matthew Lynn
-
Spring Statement: Rachel Reeves 'must turn good intentions into effective measures'Opinion Chancellor Rachel Reeves understands the economy’s structural problems but is unlikely to solve them, says Max King
