Beware: the government could cut tax relief on pension contributions
The government may soon cut tax relief on private retirement savings, says David Prosser.
Will chancellor Rishi Sunak take the axe to tax relief on private pension savings? Successive chancellors have been rumoured to be considering such changes, only to desist. But there is growing concern in the pensions industry that Sunak might see the need to repair the public finances following Covid-19 as providing the cover he needs to act.
Pension-tax relief is certainly a tempting target. It cost the Treasury £21.2bn in the 2019-2020 financial year, the last for which data is available. And it is a relief that is more valuable to the wealthy: since savers get the relief at their highest marginal rate of income tax, higher-rate taxpayers get twice as much support when making the same pension contribution as basic-rate taxpayers.
Total abolition looks out of the question for any government, let alone one that professes to be an ally of savers taking personal responsibility for their financial futures. But there is a reasonably straightforward reform that would enable the chancellor to reduce the cost of pension-tax relief while simultaneously arguing that he is redistributing resources towards middle-income voters and the less well-off.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
An extra 5%
The idea would be to introduce a flat rate of relief that everyone receives, irrespective of what income-tax rate they pay. Analysis suggests that a flat rate set at 25% would save the Treasury around £6bn a year.
And while netting that very useful windfall, the chancellor would be able to point out that anyone on the basic rate of tax would be receiving an extra 5% of relief on their savings.
The big losers in such a scenario are savers who pay higher-rate or additional-rate income tax. At present, making £10,000 of pension contributions over the course of a year costs these savers only £6,000 and £5,500 respectively. With a 25% flat rate of relief, they would have to find £7,500 to reach the same level of total savings. Those not in a position to make up the shortfall would have to settle for lower pensions later in life.
Members of defined-benefit pension schemes might also run into problems. Their retirement benefits are guaranteed, but in calculating the cost of providing that promise, employers bank on tax reliefs at their current levels. With less relief on offer to some members, that might prompt further reviews of what is affordable.
Still, do not be surprised if the chancellor puts the objections of these groups aside. The Treasury has had an eye on higher-rate pensions relief for many years, but lacked the nerve to make a grab for it. Covid-19 might prove to be the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to pounce.
In that case, wealthier savers may want to consider increasing pension contributions sooner rather than later. Some pension experts believe new tax-relief rates would have to be phased in over time; others point out that the announcement of reform would spark a “buy-now-while stocks-last” rush to make contributions while higher-rate relief is available. The chancellor may choose to pre-empt that possibility by making changes straight away.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
David Prosser is a regular MoneyWeek columnist, writing on small business and entrepreneurship, as well as pensions and other forms of tax-efficient savings and investments. David has been a financial journalist for almost 30 years, specialising initially in personal finance, and then in broader business coverage. He has worked for national newspaper groups including The Financial Times, The Guardian and Observer, Express Newspapers and, most recently, The Independent, where he served for more than three years as business editor.
-
Water companies blocked from using customer money to pay “undeserved” bonuses
The regulator has blocked three water companies from using billpayer money to pay £1.5 million in exec bonuses
By Katie Williams Published
-
Will the Bitcoin price hit $100,000?
With Bitcoin prices trading just below $100,000, we explore whether the cryptocurrency can hit the milestone.
By Dan McEvoy Published
-
Is it cheaper to be a sole trader?
It might be cheaper to be a sole trader due to changes to the tax system
By David Prosser Published
-
Should you switch your pension fund?
Many pension fund options are poor performers, thanks partly to high charges. Is it worth switching?
By David Prosser Published
-
The best fintech apps on the market
From digital banking to investment platforms, here are the top fintech apps on the market right now, according to David C. Stevenson
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
What pension providers don't tell you about your retirement money
Check the small print from your pension provider or risk losing thousands.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Britain’s stifling tax burden
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt's Autumn Statement will see the tax burden rise in each of the next 5 years.
By Emily Hohler Published
-
Brace for a year of tax rises
The government is strapped for cash, so prepare for tax rises. But it’s unlikely to be able to squeeze much more out of us.
By Matthew Lynn Published
-
Lock in high yields on savings, before they disappear
As interest rates peak, time to lock in high yields on your savings, while they are still available.
By Ruth Jackson-Kirby Published
-
Are lifestyle funds still fit for purpose?
Lifestyle funds have failed to do what they were supposed to do – shield savers from risk in the run-up to retirement.
By David Prosser Published