Two companies – Nvidia and Microsoft – each are worth more than $4 trillion. Together, that’s more than India’s and Japan’s combined annual output. Price is what you pay, as Warren Buffett put it. Value is what you get. Our question for today: how much value will investors get from the Magnificent Seven?
Our Law of Conservation of Value tells us that prices cannot stray too far or too long from value. And value depends on output. Investors ought to be able to look to a future stream of income and from it earn their money back, and more. Even in the dotcom bubble in 1999, the top firms were not as valuable or as concentrated as they are today. Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, Meta, Tesla and Amazon – together, these firms make up a third of total US stock market value, an amount roughly equal to China’s GDP.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
We don’t know how reliable or meaningful these figures are. What we do know is that they aren’t very impressive. As in the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, AI is not paying off. Huge investments are being made in the hope of creating AI-based wealth. But so far, the output doesn’t measure up.
You can go to ChatGPT, for example, and pay for the service. Many people use it occasionally – including us. But few pay for it – also including us. This would be fine, except that so much investment has gone into AI development that anything less than spectacular results will look like failure. One estimate, from Goldman Sachs, showed that the Magnificent Seven big tech stocks would have to produce $600 billion in extra annual revenue to make sense of their investment.
How will the AI boom end?
The appeal of the dotcom era was the idea that more information would lead to higher GDP growth rates with less need for capital investment.
Costly trial-and-error expansion would be replaced by less costly, more precise, knowledge-driven growth, or so it was believed. It didn’t work out that way. Productivity and growth rates generally softened throughout the 21st century. Capital investment went down. The internet/information revolution did not compensate for the decline; it seems to have made it worse. In the last half century, the rise in labour productivity in developed economies has declined from about 2% annually in the 1990s to 0.8% in the last decade, says the OECD think tank.
Will that change with AI? Probably not. The defining curse of the information revolution was too much information. It piled up. It got distorted and misinterpreted. It took time and money to store and sort. Much of it was false or useless. Now cometh AI, adding to the problem. Which leaves, at least for now, AI and the Magnificent Seven in an old-fashioned bubble. Stock prices are far higher than actual sales and profits can account for. So one way or another price and value will have to come back together. Some breakthrough might lead to a big burst of gains and growth. More likely is that stock prices will fall.
For more from Bill, see bonnerprivateresearch.com
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Three small companies with big potentialOpinion Nish Patel, portfolio manager of The Global Smaller Companies Trust, picks three small companies where he'd put his money
-
Automatic Data Processing: should you invest?Automatic Data Processing has established itself as a one-stop shop for managing the workplace. Is it a sound long-term investment?
-
Three small companies with big potential
Opinion Nish Patel, portfolio manager of The Global Smaller Companies Trust, picks three small companies where he'd put his money
-
Automatic Data Processing is making big profits from organising offices – should you invest?
Automatic Data Processing has established itself as a one-stop shop for managing the workplace. Is it a sound long-term investment?
-
Crypto mogul Do Kwon pleads guilty to fraudSouth Korean entrepreneur Do Kwon, who used to call critics cockroaches, faces a long spell in jail after pleading guilty to fraud relating to the collapse of two digital coins
-
How multi-asset trusts can help you deal with volatilityMulti-asset trusts help navigate global uncertainty and provide investors with an added layer of protection through diversification
-
When buying bank stocks, think small for the best valueBankers love to build bloated global empires, but that rarely rewards their investors, says Bruce Packard
-
How to find value in global equity marketsGlobal equities beyond America’s pricey market are bargains, says Rupert Hargreaves
-
8 of the best beachside properties for saleThe best beachside properties for sale – from an Arts & Crafts house in Hampshire with 128 metres of beach frontage, to a 16th-century house in Norfolk, just 300 metres from a Blue Flag beach
-
Emerging market stocks deliver strong growth at a bargainEmerging markets offer access to some of the world’s most compelling investment themes – here's how to gain exposure
