Tinkering with the pensions tapering system

The problems caused by the annual pension contribution allowance have been partially addressed, says David Prosser.

Most NHS staff will now escape the trap © Getty

Ministers hope Budget measures announced last week will solve the row over tax on pension contributions that has prompted senior doctors to refuse extra work or even to retire early. But the changes don’t only apply to NHS staff. Anyone previously caught out by complicated rules that reduce pension contribution allowances for high earners could benefit.

The problem centres on the annual allowance: the amount that savers may pay into their private pensions each year. For most people, the cap is £40,000 or your annual earnings if this sum is lower; go over this allowance and you face punitive tax charges. But many high earners only qualify for a reduced annual allowance. Their maximum contribution tapers down according to their income, potentially to as little as £10,000.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up
Explore More
David Prosser
Business Columnist

David Prosser is a regular MoneyWeek columnist, writing on small business and entrepreneurship, as well as pensions and other forms of tax-efficient savings and investments. David has been a financial journalist for almost 30 years, specialising initially in personal finance, and then in broader business coverage. He has worked for national newspaper groups including The Financial Times, The Guardian and Observer, Express Newspapers and, most recently, The Independent, where he served for more than three years as business editor.